I am well aware of what current law says....
Then link, cite and quote it.
...and what liberal judges have pushed 40-60 years ago. Abortion became legal due to that sort in Roe - but it was WRONG!
So if you say a Scotus opinion is wrong, it doesn't count? For decades I argued that Roe was wrongly decided. I believe it was correctly returned to state jurisdiction.
I can’t help it if the 60s on have seen the Courts push to make being here illegally acceptable. But it is WRONG.
Your argument boils down to you do not like the applicable law.
My argument is that the courts are often filled with ignorant people who are unaware of the truth prior to making their rulings, and therefore they bungle the law because they are ignorant.
How many of those courts knew of that Pennsylvania Supreme Court book? How many knew it was clearly spelled out in that book?
They were all listening to William Rawle, who can be shown to be *LYING* when he claims English common law as the source for American citizenship.