You're wrong.
And the thing is, you're too stupid and dishonest ever to be able to understand why, even if it were explained to you in words of one syllable.
Troll.
Try reading the article:
“Many assurances of vaccine safety assume that any damage will be seen within 28 days of vaccination, meaning signals after 60 days would be missed.”
Actually, this means that deaths 60 days after vaccination are not caused by the vaccine.
“In total, there were 12 sudden deaths with no underlying cause: eight in the vaccine group and four in the placebo group.”
“Three occurred in each group during the first 60 days; subsequently, five occurred in the vaccine group but just one in the placebo group.”
IOW, since four of those deaths in the vaccine group were not caused by the vaccine, then there was no difference between the vaccine and the placebo groups.
Doug, Doug, Doug, If I shot you today and you died as a result within one year, I could be charged with murder.
Note: I didn not specify whether with a gun or a syringe...
You're wrong.
And the thing is, you're too stupid and dishonest ever to be able to understand why, even if it were explained to you in words of one syllable.
Troll.
How many shots have You Had?
The article says that due to erroneous assumptions adverse events after 60 days would be missed. You seem to be adverse to reading comprehension. I believe it’s intentionally obtuse. Obtuse in this case meaning frustratingly slow to comprehend.
I am embarrassed that you live in my state. Your insistence in denying information, data … in your defense of a defective product is inexcusable. The lies in regard to almost all the data around these product is growing continuously. The reality is obvious at this point but like a moth to the flame you run in with so much misinformation, lies and BS. By your definition that post 60 days it’s not related would clear thalidomide.