I read the entire article at WSJ. I agree with the overwhelming number of WSJ commenters on the article that, first of all, for the article to be place in the news section rather than the opinion section of the paper was a disservice to its readers.
Secondly, the commenters all agreed that the entire article was nothing but a white-washing piece of b.s. that was meant to mislead the people regarding the collaboration between the White House and DOJ on Trump’s indictments and the cover-up of Biden’s crimes. Garland and Biden’s relationship has never been ‘frosty’ and it is certainly not ‘frigid’ now unless Biden is upset that Garland screwed up by letting the judge actually read Hunter’s plea agreement before approving its contents.
Your thoughtful analysis is appreciated. Good observation that the article was in the liberal slanted news section, rather than the more conservative opinion section of the WSJ. There were a lot of comments for the article.