More evasion on your part, as I expected. No anger here, though.
Just amusement at your continued evasion of a simple question.
You can't answer it because it blows up the myth you can't bear to let go.
Why do YOU think the Russian army retreated from Kherson?
Are you capable of thinking how and why that happened, and how and why the Russians can't do anything about it? I think you're afraid to, and your next reply will be more evasion, and more refusal to address the simple question:
Why do YOU think the Russian army retreated from Kherson?
None of the Russophiles on this board will touch that question.
They dare not.
There's just no spinning the obvious failure.
General Sergei Surovikin, November 9th, 2022: "Having comprehensively assessed the current situation, it is proposed to take up defence along the left (eastern) bank of the Dnipro River," said Surovikin, standing at a lectern and indicating troop positions on a map whose details were greyed-out for the TV audience.
"I understand that this is a very difficult decision, but at the same time we will preserve the most important thing - the lives of our servicemen and, in general, the combat effectiveness of the group of troops, which it is futile to keep on the right bank in a limited area."
Since you don't understand anything about the military, military strategy or military tactics, it would never occur to you that the Ukrainians might blow up a dam to cut off the Russian forces on the right bank [west bank] of the Dniepr River.
But military people on the Russian side DID think about that. So they shortened their lines, and removed their men and the Russian civilians from danger.
And what do you know: The Ukrainians blew up the dam.
And the Ukies are STILL being turned into burger by the 8 to 1 artillery advantage of the Russian forces - including the press-ganged Ukie schlubs on the right bank in Kherson proper. 