Posted on 07/27/2023 9:12:25 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
The media are so desperate for Republicans to nominate Donald Trump that they’ve turned over 96.7 percent of their programming to covering him, with brief interruptions for Emmett Till updates. Like dogs playing a game of fetch for eternity, they never tire of rehashing Trump’s legal troubles, his behavior on Jan. 6 (which has now been more investigated than the Kennedy assassination), his payment to a stripper, his call to election officials in Georgia and on and on and on.
It has become clear that the media also plan to make the GOP presidential primaries entirely about Trump. Every Republican running for president is required to spend half of any interview answering questions about the former president. Even when they’re not saying anything at all about him, somehow the media make it about Trump.
E.g.:
Ron DeSantis gives a speech in South Carolina not mentioning Trump.
Headline: “Ron DeSantis says little about Trump indictment; decries unequal justice and ‘weaponization‘” — USA Today
Mike Pence announces he’s running for president.
Headline: “Pence Delivers Strong Rebuke to Trump in Campaign Announcement” — New York Times
Nikki Haley attacks Trump.
Headline: “Nikki Haley accused of ‘MAGA agenda’ after supporting abortion restrictions in town hall” — The Guardian
Candidates who aren’t talking about Trump are attacked for “enabling” him. MSNBC’s totally objective, nonpartisan anchor Jen Psaki denounced Republicans on Monday, complaining that, unless they’re constantly berating him, “they are effectively enabling a guy who led an attempted coup. And for what? To maybe win a handful of delegates?”
Republicans, forget the pledge to support the party’s nominee. It’s pointless, irrelevant, stupid and openly defied, as it was in 2016 by Jeb! and John Kasich. The pledge we need candidates to take is this: We jointly refuse to answer any more questions about Trump.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Since your post contains no content of any sort or explanation, or rebuttal, i’m just going to assume you’re too stupid to have read or understood the article
Geez is there no one here that actually read the article?
For you less skilled in literary comprehension I’ll summarize it answers every media outlet twists the story to somehow include trump in the title.
It’s not anti trump at all
So, why did they talk about him 24/7 when he was President?
Ann Coulter would be a better person without fingers and vocal cords. She would still be a skinny tranny, but more tolerable
>>”Since your post contains no content of any sort or explanation”
The post contains content (i.e. Ann Coulter is not on my side and neither are you, from the sound of it). The explanation as to why Ann Coulter is not on my side is self evident to anyone who’s familiar with her and is also familiar with my political positions via my postings on this forum.
The conclusion that you’re also not on my side is a simple logical deduction based on the implication that you and Ann are on the same side.
Whether I read this particular article of hers, (which I did) is extraneous, and not relevant to my initial comment that you and Ann Coulter or not on my side. Hopefully that explains it sufficiently. But if you still don’t understand it, I’ll try to dumb it down for you.
Actually, it’s No More Talking About Ann!
‘
Her advice to the other candidates is foolish. Trump is the clear front runner. Not talking about him is not a viable options for them if their goal is to win the nomination. She can talk all she wants about the MSM forcing them to talk about Trump and/or twisting their words when they do. But the real takeaway is they’re damned if they do (talk about Trump) and damned if they don’t. And of course, that’s only true because they’re all weak candidates who have no viable strategy for defeating a very strong, popular candidate.
Ann seems the type you’re glad you broke up with.
To paraphrase Reagan, conservatives read Ann but Americans understand Ann. This wasn’t a pro-Trump article at all. Ann has been trying to get people to stop talking about Trump altogether.
She must be happy because she never attacks Biden, only Trump.
Exactly.
You got it!
You said we are lucky to have her on our side.
I was just agreeing with the other poster that she’s not on my side, and neither are you, from the sound of it.
Are you all caught up now?
Anne's new theme.
I’m caught up with how stupid you are if you think that’s true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.