Has the Supreme Court ever taken a look at the constitutionality of FISA?
Do Wickkard v. Filbourne.
>>the ability of the federal government to function effectively is at stake.
They say that as if it’s a bad thing...
Kill the beast by requiring direct taxes, wages, etc, (except income) to be apportioned. The court ruled in Glenshaw glass that income is actually all appurtenances to wealth as opposed to the original meaning as a derivation (calculation on principal) from a source. That means increases in nominal value from outside like inflation are taxed.
Courts should simply not admit the regulatory texts into evidence.
If the Congressional act is too vague, strike it down.
Modern word processing software makes it very easy for governments to write laws.
What they’re going to get rid of is “Chevron Defense”. In 1984 Scotus issued a ruling that basically said where the law is ambiguous the federal courts would defer to the administrative agencies interpretations of the law. This was an enormous grant of power to executive branch agencies. SCOTUS will almost certainly roll back that huge grant of power to the agencies.
All the things Lefties are whining about the court doing now is simply overturning a lot of decisions the leftist Supreme Court made from about 1965-1985.
The Chevron deference is destined to ashheap of history. Vote will be 6-3, maybe 7-2.
The Fed agencies are an entire 777 airliner full of 500 lb passengers.