Posted on 04/29/2023 3:07:40 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi
The Marshal never interviewed the justices. All the other worker bees had to sit in and be interviewed or investigated. Now Alito says he thinks he knows who did it but chose not to tell the investigators, what a loser.
He said he didn't have enough proof to name the leaker, meaning publicly. He didn't say he kept that from the investigators.
Then you call him a loser. I think we know who the loser is here.
Proof required in court is greater than proof required to kill the leaker.
Until people begin to die, there is no way to defeat the left
He’s a loser. No justice talked to the investigator. All their staff got the gut punch.
I met Alito and had a long candid discussion with him at an event. He is deeply religious and a fighter, remember he called out Obama during a State of the Union address. He is anything but a loser
That’s what it sounds like to me.
glowie?
that’s scary.
Communists are evil to the core.
wow
He just said, by means of a question, that he and those of his colleagues that constituted a deciding majority in Dobbs are not responsible for the leak of the Dobbs draft. He has personally concluded who the leaker is, but being Catholic knows where the line is beyond which he could credibly be accused of calumny or at least detraction for parting with that personal conclusion. What more do you want from him?
Fed?
I expected him to be a leader and defend his staff. Not only that, he chose not to be interviewed. He allowed his staff to get the gut punch.
You seem to be advocating for the abandonment of the rule of law.
Could you explain further please? From what you are saying it’s not clear he did anything wrong or failed to do the right thing.
At no point did he stand up and defend his staff. He allowed them to have their future potential hurt by such a environment that they couldn't be trusted, nor any other person working for the Justice's. Now, he puts his character out there saying he knows he did it, and didn't report it. He's a loser.
My guess is a law clerk leaked it after being instructed by a Supreme Court Justice. I think either Sotomayor or Kagan.
It does appear that he is deliberately and publicly leaving Roberts off of his short list (the five of us) of those Justices who should be considered above suspicion in terms of who leaked the draft. And it does appear that he is saying that he has personally concluded that one of the remaining four deliberately leaked the draft for nefarious purposes.
You make a valid point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.