Posted on 12/21/2022 8:28:26 AM PST by Golden Eagle
I Hobbs going to testify, or did she weasel her way out of it?
Lake’s attorneys dropped the subpoena last night. Not watching the proceedings so far but I would be interested in knowing more also.
19 inch ballot image printed on 20 inch pape - was the cause of the tabulation errors.
Not an error, needed password access to printer scripts.
This morning Kari said that they needed to concentrate their time on other witnessess besides Hobbs. They only have two days and Hobbs wouldn’t be the best use of their time.
It sounded like a weasel excuse, but what do I know? To me it sounds like heavy handed threats.
They need to look at the login access logs, for the time in question, to find the culprits then. That's probably deeper than this trial will go, but that would be the fingerprints left. Wouldn't surprise me if they were already deleted, though, unfortunately.
Damn! I missed that. Eating lunch.
Certainly not if all she has to say is “I don’t recall.”
The most frequently used phrase in all of Democrat defendantdom.
19in image on a 20 in page would not be tabulated sucessfully on ANY tabulator.
This guy rocks.
“Your technical description is not possible”
19 inch image to 20 inch paper is not shrink to fit. Nor is it the opposite of shrink to fit.
Barnes: it doesn’t happen accidentally. Someone put in a password and printed 19 inch image to 20 inch paper.
Lake has a lot of Moxie! This is a wild charge of the Light brigade moment that may well lead her to great places—LIKE Trump’s VP slot? The White House after Trumps possible assassination. I trust her to lead the nation—she will be “Trump’s Revenge” as he was “The Revenge of the Tea Party.”
“Your technical description is not possible”
He’s right.
The cross-examining attorney is trying to make us believe that the witness is implying that the elections workers manning the printers somehow are, on-the-fly, selecting the “shrink to fit” option to skew results.
As far as I know, “shrink to fit” is managed in the computer, not the printer. So whomever is manning the computers/software, possibly or probably off site, are manipulating the printers to shoot out ballots that are unreadable by the tabulators.
The attorney asked the questions knowing that it would be impossible for the witness to answer.
Anyhow, that’s how I see it.
Worth clarifying that witness made it clear that the settings are set using scripts and can only be changed with password.
Someone can’t just accidentally nudge the printer and print off 1000s of bad ballots.
Nor could they have just pressed the wrong button to change settings: they had to use the admin password.
The 19 inch image has become a major problem for the Maricopa officials who said it could not happen.
The 19 inch image > 20 inch paper causing mistabulation sigificantly suppressed Lake votes, regardless of how duplicates were handled.
“Worth clarifying that witness made it clear that the settings are set using scripts and can only be changed with password.”
Exactly. Only the guy(s) managing the computers have the permissions to do that. It’s not like Bertha, at the precinct who’s done this since 1950, prints a ballot and says, “Oops. I think I pushed the wrong button.” It can’t happen.
I hope the judge has enough tech savvy to understand the “shrink to fit” option. Because the trickery in the question is purposeful to make the witness sound like he’s obfuscating.
How did six vote centres all make the same 19 inch ‘mistake’? Obviously because it was not a mistake.
“How did six vote centres all make the same 19 inch ‘mistake’? Obviously because it was not a mistake.”
It had to have been done through the mainframe, by system administrator(s).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.