To: SmokingJoe
There is no "should". Just do it. The longer you talk beforehand the greater there's the chance that someone will sue (probably at the direction of the FBI) to prevent Twitter from releasing it. Then they get it in front of a Deep State judge and Musk will not be allowed to talk about it or to even talk about the fact that he can't talk about it.
4 posted on
11/25/2022 5:46:15 PM PST by
KarlInOhio
(Soon the January 6 protesters will be held (without trial or bail) longer than Jefferson Davis was.)
To: KarlInOhio
The "should" is in the headline by The Independent. The excerpt tells a very different story...
@ALX: “Raise your hand if you think @ElonMusk should make public all internal discussions about the decision to censor the @NYPost’s story on Hunter Biden’s laptop before the 2020 Election in the interest of Transparency.” Mr Musk responded shortly thereafer in kind: “This is necessary to restore public trust.”
Musk did NOT say "It should be done." There's a world of difference between poorly written headline and what was tweeted.
8 posted on
11/25/2022 6:05:54 PM PST by
ProtectOurFreedom
(If you're not part of the solution, you're just scumming up the bottom of the beaker!)
To: KarlInOhio
'zactly !
10 posted on
11/25/2022 7:19:00 PM PST by
A strike
("The worse, the better." - V.I.Lenin, (and Klaus Schwab and Soros))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson