Skip to comments.Federal Court Cancels Hearing Over Trump Election Lawyer’s Attempt to Reclaim Seized Phone After DOJ Obtains SECOND Search Warrant
Posted on 08/30/2022 10:07:45 AM PDT by bitt
click here to read article
Am I misunderstanding? They grabbed the phone with a potentially bogus warrant? But then — after they grabbed the phone — they went and got a second warrant. So that makes it all OK?
No one is allowed to Stop The Steal.
The criminals take over and make sure no one apprehends them.
Judge Robert Brack, a George W. Bush appointee wrote
Lets start being hones.....Judge Robert Brack, a globalist/UNIPARTY/NWO appointee that will and is doing the bidding of his masters in an attempt, any attempt to find something on Donald J Trump.
Was the phone seized BEFORE the 2ND WARRANT WAS ISSUED?
Only one thing will end this criminal gooberment.
I’m ready for it. Not just to watch though.
I thought you weren’t allowed to just try to get another warrant if you took something without a warrant?
“The beatings will continue until ... “
Once fooled can happen to anyone. Three hundred and seven times fooled takes a federal judge who earns six figures to be a completely corrupt puppet. Nobody is that stupid.
Yeah, I’m pretty sure that is not how things are supposed to work in this country. You screw up a warrant, and everything you seized is inadmissible, no matter if you get a “good” warrant later on.
Trump can afford to get every new model of iPhone and probably does. His January 6th phone has probably been given to charity after getting scrubbed.
And I thought the government was concerned with presidential documents.
The heart of the matter is that the government continues to go after Trump’s attorneys and his attorney client privilege. They did that with Michael Cohen, they did that with the illegal warrant to raid Mara-Lago, and they did that with Eastman’s phone and emails. There is a clear pattern here.
That means The Senate Club loved Bobby Braaaap.
There is inevitable Discovery but I think that’s something different.
A nice decapitation would be nice
Do I have that right?
How could that not stand up to a legal challenge, if I interpret it correctly?????
What would stop any agency from seizing property without a warrant, pawing through it to look for things, then saying "we can't find the warrant" but using what they found in their seizure and search to fill in the blanks for something specific?
This stinks to high heaven, if I interpret that correctly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.