Posted on 06/10/2022 6:49:28 PM PDT by Engraved-on-His-hands
A Russian lawmaker called for Lithuania's independence to be repealed, submitting a draft bill claiming the Baltic republic illegally left the Soviet Union more than three decades ago.
The proposed legislation was submitted to the Russian lower house, the Duma, on Wednesday by Yevgeny Fyodorov, a member of the ruling United Russia party.
In March 1990, Lithuania became the first republic to announce it intended to restore its independence from the disintegrating USSR, under whose control it had been for five decades after the Soviet army occupied it in 1940.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...
Good god, man. You’ve been yapping for months and wearing us out. Go sign up already.
“...this type of comparison is a not-right-in-the-head justification.
Plus the fact they have given multiple differing weird reasons for ukraine.”
🇺🇸🕶👍
There is literally no moral, logical, or reasonable way to argue against this statement.
Dr Carol Quigley was correct. The globalist had already taken control by the late 1960’s, but there were also roughly four globalist factions, all seeking ascendancy/control over the rest.
These included the EU, US, CCCP, and the outlier of China.
Different theories were discussed, but it was plausible there would be a Moscow/Beijing, EU/Beijing, or US/EU vs Moscow/Beijing “tug of war”, to control all others.
Leftist from each of these were seeking global ascendancy and hegemony. The US was the most powerful, but also the most split politically. Prescott Bush was mentioned in Quigley’s 1960’s “Tragedy and Hope”, as being part of a group seeking US control over the global governance architecture. The hard left in America were happy with a non-Us led global government, and an overt Marxist one at that. More like a “Supreme Soviet” type idea.
However, regardless of who would win out, they were all globalists. Outside of Quigley, several of those in the know, saw corruption and demoralization/perversion .strategies were also threats to the West within the efforts to take control.
It was much more detailed than what I have portrayed.
Decades later, it has become apparent the later axis/allies alignment is the direction.
Moscow was really close to controlling the EU through energy and food supply. If they would have been successful, we would have seen a Moscow/Bejing axis determining EU finance, trade, and military/NATO policy.
UA was/is merely a “stepping stone”. UA was never an end, and Moscow and Bejing needed a neutralized/corrupted US government and Pentagon to even get this far.
Regardless of UA, this will go sideways for the Moscow/Beijing/Tehran as proxy axis.
This will in time get much more deadly.
And by the way, the ridiculous psyop, and now end of the AZOV BN, was not marked by Moscow ceasing anything.
Good points and background info.
the excuses are all lies like FJBs BS
Exactly. Now we have Putin on record stating it was nothing b ut a land grab.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.