Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Comptroller: Companies ‘boycotting’ fossil fuels could lose state funding
KXON ^ | Mar 16, 2022 | Maggie Glynn

Posted on 05/22/2022 3:34:05 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie

AUSTIN (Nexstar) — Texas Comptroller Glenn Hegar sent a letter to 19 financial companies that he alleges could be ‘boycotting the fossil fuel industry.’

Hegar is asking the companies, including JP Morgan and Wells Fargo, to clarify their fossil fuel investment policies and procedures, and has requested a list of any mutual funds or exchange-traded funds in their portfolios that may prohibit or limit investment in fossil fuels.

It’s part of Hegar’s efforts to implement Senate Bill 13, which was passed during the 87th Regular Legislative Session.

The bill does not prohibit these companies from boycotting fossil fuels, but rather prohibits Texas state agencies that invest funds from investing in financial companies that boycott energy companies.

(Excerpt) Read more at kxan.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: boycott; energy; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
Could it be sanity is returning?
1 posted on 05/22/2022 3:34:05 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

“Could it be sanity is returning?”

Here in Texas we do get some things right. If Texas or Florida get big enough “economy wise” things could get interesting.


2 posted on 05/22/2022 3:41:14 PM PDT by nomorelurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

This law doesn’t make sense to me. Only a left-winger would suggest that the government should try to dictate where anyone invests their money.

And is the restriction only against companies that explicitly say they’re boycotting for that reason? Suppose they just happen not to invest in fossil-fuel companies, perhaps because they don’t think the stock prices in the sector represent a good value right now. Companies don’t have to report to the government *why* they made some investment decision.


3 posted on 05/22/2022 3:49:14 PM PDT by Alvin Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

There was an article posted earlier where those responses from the companies came back. All insisted they were not blackballing funding. My favorite was the response from one - “Hell No!”


4 posted on 05/22/2022 3:50:49 PM PDT by BiglyCommentary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alvin Diogenes

Had you read the article, it would make sense.


5 posted on 05/22/2022 3:53:08 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

This doesn’t sound like sanity, it sounds like petulance. Funds need to make their own decisions, given the volatility of the energy market it’s perfectly valid to not invest in it.


6 posted on 05/22/2022 3:55:09 PM PDT by discostu (like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Is it more or less volatile than commercial real estate or movie making?


7 posted on 05/22/2022 3:57:56 PM PDT by steve8714 (Evidently the Oxford comma is racist, sexist, or homophobic. You decide which.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

I did read the article. It’s not a good idea for the government to be able to require that a business say *why* they made a certain investment. Are we going to see money wasted on lawsuits regarding whether an stock purchase decision was a “boycott” or just a routine investment judgment?


8 posted on 05/22/2022 3:59:50 PM PDT by Alvin Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: steve8714
Is it more or less volatile than commercial real estate or movie making?

That's for the investor to decide, not the government.
9 posted on 05/22/2022 4:00:55 PM PDT by Alvin Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

Neither of those live on a 90 day spec market where any news makes the prices fluctuate drastically. Energy is a crazy business.


10 posted on 05/22/2022 4:01:07 PM PDT by discostu (like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: discostu
This doesn’t sound like sanity, it sounds like petulance. Funds need to make their own decisions, given the volatility of the energy market it’s perfectly valid to not invest in it.

Yes, petulance is a great description of this.

Government shouldn't be picking winners and losers.
11 posted on 05/22/2022 4:02:25 PM PDT by Alvin Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Energy does not survive on false depreciation nor on phony accounting.


12 posted on 05/22/2022 4:04:43 PM PDT by steve8714 (Evidently the Oxford comma is racist, sexist, or homophobic. You decide which.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alvin Diogenes

This is right inline with Texas’ don’t say bad things about beef law.


13 posted on 05/22/2022 4:05:17 PM PDT by discostu (like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

Enron begs to differ.


14 posted on 05/22/2022 4:05:36 PM PDT by discostu (like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: discostu
This is right inline with Texas’ don’t say bad things about beef law.

I forgot all about that... You're right. That was a bad law too. (And both laws go against any sort of principled conservativism.)
15 posted on 05/22/2022 4:07:35 PM PDT by Alvin Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Alvin Diogenes
I wrote: ... conservativism

... conservatism, LOL. (Dumb typo.)
16 posted on 05/22/2022 4:08:40 PM PDT by Alvin Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Alvin Diogenes

Makes sense to me. I live in Texas, and any financial company that specifically boycotts energy companies shouldn’t be profiting from state investments.


17 posted on 05/22/2022 4:09:28 PM PDT by Quickgun (I got here kicking,screaming and covered in someone else's blood. I can go out that way if I have to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Quickgun
Makes sense to me. I live in Texas, and any financial company that specifically boycotts energy companies shouldn’t be profiting from state investments.

Would it be a good idea to go whole hog and just require investments to be only in Texas-based companies? Why send your money out of state, after all?

Where would this end?
18 posted on 05/22/2022 4:13:38 PM PDT by Alvin Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Alvin Diogenes

agreed 💯


19 posted on 05/22/2022 4:23:35 PM PDT by M_Continuum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alvin Diogenes

These companies are issuing a policy against investing in energy. These companies should be required to advise their stock holders and investors that this is their policy regardless of investment analysis.


20 posted on 05/22/2022 4:29:00 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Biden not only suffers fools and criminals, he appoints them to positions of responsibility. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson