Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitch McConnell Donates to Liz Cheney, Joining GOP Proxy War
breitbart.com ^ | 4/7/22 | WENDELL HUSEBØ

Posted on 04/07/2022 8:20:08 AM PDT by cotton1706

The ringleader of the establishment Republicans, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY), announced on Thursday a donation to Democrat ally Rep. Liz Cheney’s (R-WY) reelection campaign.

Cheney, who is no longer recognized as a Republican by the Wyoming GOP, has received a campaign contribution from the Senate GOP leader, McConnell told Axios. When asked if he will hold a fundraiser or other campaign event with Cheney, McConnell redirected the conversation back to his lane of Senate business.

McConnell and Cheney apparently believe the Wyoming member may lose her seat to Trump-endorsed Harriet Hageman, a strong threat to the establishment Republican order in Washington, DC. With Hageman catching momentum heading into the August 16 GOP primary, former President George Bush has also donated the legal maximum amount to Cheney. McConnell and Bush are joined in their support of Cheney by failed presidential candidate Mitt Romney (R-UT). In March, Romney delivered a speech at a closed fundraiser for the embattled Cheney.

The Wyoming race has become a proxy war between the establishment and conservative Republicans. Hageman has earned the support of House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA). Party leaders typically rarely endorse against sitting members of Congress. But after Cheney deserted the Republican party by allying herself with Nancy Pelosi’s January 6 committee and reportedly “orchestrated unprecedented” Republican sabotage, McCarthy presumably believed Cheney must be ousted from her seat.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections; US: Kentucky; US: Wyoming
KEYWORDS: breitbart; elections; harriethageman; kentucky; lizcheney; mitchmcconnell; trump; wendellhusebo; wyoming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last
To: cotton1706

what a scumbag.needed dump McC a long time ago


61 posted on 04/07/2022 9:45:21 AM PDT by CarolinaReaganFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

“gotta wonder why Mitch would smear his hands so badly like this”

Because he’s untouchable. He was just reelected and is likely in his final term so he can do what he wants with no comeuppance.


62 posted on 04/07/2022 9:52:06 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Turdles and Lizards—both are Reptiles…


63 posted on 04/07/2022 10:16:25 AM PDT by Skybird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

I see

thanks for that info

at least he is in his last term. that is something to be thankful for

these backstabbing liars have done our country too much damage already


64 posted on 04/07/2022 10:19:34 AM PDT by faithhopecharity (“Politicians are not born. They’re excreted.” Marcus Tillius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey

Alright, guess you aren’t man enough to just come out and speak plainly, Mr. Riddles.


65 posted on 04/07/2022 10:33:55 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RckyRaCoCo

No doubt!


66 posted on 04/07/2022 10:40:57 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

A promise to not vote for McConnell as leader is a requirement to receive my vote in this year’s senatorial election here in PA.
No offense, but that’s about as dumb a promise as any Senate candidate can make right now. That’s precisely what doomed the Alabama campaigns of Roy Moore in 2017 and Mo Brooks this year.

Openly refusing to support a sitting GOP Senate leader who isn’t facing any kind of a leadership challenge is ludicrous. If a GOP candidate for the U.S. Senate from Pennsylvania goes on to win in November, who is he supposed to vote for as Senate majority leader? And how is he going to accomplish a single thing for Pennsylvania in a legislative body if he has alienated the current leader and all the other U.S. Senators who support him?

This is the kind of amateurish approach to national politics that destroys the GOP.
_______________________________________________________

Well, taking the “high road approach” you espouse has gotten us, just where??
You’re rational is why we are EXACTLY where we are today. I too am guilty of this, but NO MORE!!!!!!!!!!
If we are doomed, I am going down on principles, not carrying water for the deep state RINO hoard, who hate this Country just a little less than pathetic libs!


67 posted on 04/07/2022 10:41:37 AM PDT by bantam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: chopperk

Appears Tucker is right again!


68 posted on 04/07/2022 11:08:29 AM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

Lots of FReepers love him. They totally buy into the ‘lesser of two evils” Uniparty triangulation scheme, which has incrementally pushed the country further and further to the left over the past 50 years.

But as long as the GOP gets their fair share of November victories every 2 years, they are happy to be blind to what’s going on over the long term.


69 posted on 04/07/2022 11:15:05 AM PDT by The Fop (God Bless Donald Trump, Frank Sinatra, Joan Rivers, and the Fightin' Rat Pack Wing of the GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

The GOP is a worthless sack of garbage with the exception of a small handful of Congressmen. It needs to be burned to the ground and “built back better”.

We can start by lighting at least 47 of the 50 GOP Senators on fire.

But don’t mind me, go back to watching Sean Hannity and Mark Levin.


70 posted on 04/07/2022 11:25:11 AM PDT by The Fop (God Bless Donald Trump, Frank Sinatra, Joan Rivers, and the Fightin' Rat Pack Wing of the GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA
Not voting for McConnell is a necessary first acid test.

I have the same high expectations as you. Heck -- that's why I've never been registered as a Republican in the first place.

I'm talking about political processes and the realities of operating in a legislative body. I'd love to have you (and other Freepers) answer the question I posed to you earlier: If a GOP candidate for the U.S. Senate announces that he won't support Mitch McConnell for the GOP leadership post in the Senate, then who is he supposed to vote for?

71 posted on 04/07/2022 12:08:34 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Mr. Potato Head ... Mr. Potato Head! Back doors are not secrets.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: bantam
See Post #71. I have no interest in taking a "high road."

What I AM doing is pointing out that a legislator has to operate much differently than an executive leader like the president or a governor.

Some of the most principled legislators in Congress are also completely ineffective because they don't have any leverage to cut deals. I'll offer Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky as a perfect case in point.

72 posted on 04/07/2022 12:12:14 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Mr. Potato Head ... Mr. Potato Head! Back doors are not secrets.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: The Fop
The GOP is a worthless sack of garbage with the exception of a small handful of Congressmen. It needs to be burned to the ground and "built back better."

If you say so. I'm not a Republican, so I don't have a dog in that hunt. Let me know how that works out for you.

And I haven't watched Sean Hannity or Mark Levin in years. Hannity's content is tailored to an audience with an IQ of 90, while Levin comes across as a genius because he caters to an audience with an average intelligence.

73 posted on 04/07/2022 12:14:22 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Mr. Potato Head ... Mr. Potato Head! Back doors are not secrets.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: wiseprince

I’d vote for the RAT if I lived in WY if Cheney wins the GOP Primary.
Without hesitation, to get rid of Cheney once and for all.


74 posted on 04/07/2022 12:18:08 PM PDT by tennmountainman ( Less Lindell CONS, More AZ Style Audits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA
A promise to not vote for McConnell as leader is a requirement to receive my vote in this year’s senatorial election here in PA. It needs to be said out loud and multiple times and be completely believable. Otherwise, I not vote at all. I will not vote for a RINO again. It is no different than voting for a Democrat.

Well said! I haven't followed the Pennsylvania race closely. I know there are several Republican candidates for the open seat. How do they stack up, based on this criterion?
75 posted on 04/07/2022 12:32:14 PM PDT by Eagle Forgotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: The Fop

I DON’T love him.

He’s an Abomination. Replace him.


76 posted on 04/07/2022 12:40:39 PM PDT by sauropod (So may we start? It's time to start.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child; ConservativeInPA; G Larry; Owen; DoughtyOne; bantam
About the 2023 Republican leadership vote in the Senate, Alberta's Child asks: If a GOP candidate for the U.S. Senate announces that he won't support Mitch McConnell for the GOP leadership post in the Senate, then who is he supposed to vote for?

A fair question. Best case would be to vote for a genuine conservative challenger who can win. Second-best, vote for a genuine conservative challenger who has no hope of winning but whose campaign gets some votes, to send a message.

If you're implying that there won't even be a challenger -- regretfully, I think you're probably right. But in that case, conservatives can simply abstain.

Suppose there are 53 Republican Senators. McConnell chosen as Majority Leader by a vote of 53-0 tells him "Steady as you go, no changes needed." A vote of 50-0 with three abstentions tells him that there's some dissatisfaction with him. And a vote of 40-0 with 13 abstentions would really get his attention.
77 posted on 04/07/2022 12:45:08 PM PDT by Eagle Forgotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Forgotten
How do they stack up, based on this criterion?

Dr. Oz is running for Senate. I will never vote for a Muslim. I will never vote for a carpet bagger from New Jersey. I will never vote for someone who has duel citizenship with Turkey. (He said he would renounce if became Senator - sorry too late.) I will never vote for someone who hires wetbacks. Dr. Oz is out, he doesn't even get the opportunity to answer the question about McConnell.

Kathy Barnette and Carla Sands both have ties to PDJT. We have seen how women work out particularly in the Senate. I can't name one example that was decent. (When it comes to men, I can only name one or two - so not a big difference.) I have yet to hear either address the question about voting for McConnell as leader. I am waiting to hear more.

George Bochetto and Sean Gale are both lawyers. I have never heard much about them or their stance on McConnell.

David McCormick is a hedge fund guy. So was Toomey. That didn't workout too well. He has money and runs pretty ads. No word on McConnell and I don't know much about the guy.

Jeff Bartos ran against baby killer, child rapist and torturer enabler Bob Casey previously and lost. He said in October 2017 he would not vote for McConnell, and still holds this position. That was long before this became a popular issue.

I will wait until more is known about the candidates to make my decision. Basically, they all start off with negatives, even Bartos since he lost against Casey. Casey should be completely beatable for anyone that has the testicular fortitude to fight against him. I am tired of voting for wimps.

78 posted on 04/07/2022 2:02:47 PM PDT by ConservativeInPA (Scratch a leftist and you'll find a fascist )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA

Thanks for the recap on the Pennsylvania candidates! I hope someone good emerges from that field.


79 posted on 04/07/2022 2:48:23 PM PDT by Eagle Forgotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Ditch Mitch!


80 posted on 04/07/2022 3:04:55 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson