The perfect counter question.
Judge Jackson, “if you cannot define a woman, or tell us the the difference between a man and a woman, consider that we already have a black man Clearance Justice sitting on the court, and precisely because blacks are no more than 15% of the US population, we should pass you over because your only defining qualification was that you are a woman of black color as defined by the President. Do you think the SCOTUS might be better served with someone of different race, such as the heritage of India like our vice president rather than over representation by blacks?”
That moment when you have to decide if the poster is being funny or is just ignorant...