That’s true, but the common denominator in all of this is Perkins-Coie. All roads lead back to that firm and Elias. That could be the key to unravel the entire conspiracy. So while the major players did talk about the Steele dossier in the Oval, where they aware it was Clinton op-research?
I don’t believe the principals have acknowledged knowing the dossier was BS. They all admit awareness of its existence, but not the source. If it can be shown their awareness, then they would be party to the conspiracy as well.
You also have the side show with the five I’s which could also be involved. Regardless, this is a large onion that Durham will have to unravel layer by layer.
I’m afraid it’s beginning to appear that Durham isn’t going to actually rehash any of the “old” information, or consider any of the previous criminal referrals that were already sent long ago to the Justice Department by the House or Senate Judiciary committees. According to this article Devin Nunes sent 14 criminal referrals alone:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/devin-nunes-expects-many-more-durham-indictments
Durham’s been looking at this for a year and a half, and all we have is this one indictment he’s trying to base on this new angle he’s working regarding DNS server addresses. Maybe it will lead somewhere but how all those other criminal referrals are just being ignored is a huge red flag for me.