Election investigators haven't found evidence of counterfeit ballots in Georgia

Based upon interviews with the foregoing witnesses, as well as other witnesses who were interviewed during the course of the investigation, and in the inspection of approximately 1,000 absentee ballots and ballot images, the Secretary's investigators have been unable to substantiate the allegations that fraudulent or counterfeit ballots were counted.

Investigators looked into claims made by Suzi Voyles, who worked the county's risk-limiting audit and claimed to see a batch of "pristine" ballots that looked suspicious. Voyles is now running for Congress as a Republican in the 6th Congressional District.

After interviewing Voyles two separate times, investigators checked several batches of absentee ballots that she claimed were marked by computer instead of by hand. But they found no irregularities or any ballots that appeared to be counterfeits.

The court filing also found no evidence to corroborate claims that workers at State Farm Arena counted fraudulent ballots that were hidden under a table or that they scanned the ballots multiple times.

Investigators reviewed security footage that showed a ballot bin placed under a table earlier in the day before being removed and counted later that night. This particular false claim was most prominently made by former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani in a December 2020 committee hearing and has been repeated by many Republican lawmakers through the present day.

"Witnesses told investigators that the ballot scanners were frequently jamming, requiring them to make multiple attempts to clearly scan all of the ballots in each batch," the filing reads. "In order to tabulate the ballots, the scanners must first get a clear scan of the entire batch of ballots. Scanning is simply one step in the tabulation process."

You don't have to believe the NPR affiliate, as well you shouldn't believe them just because they "say so". NPR isn't the arbiter of truth just as no one source is.

I just link to it because it seems, in my opinion, to be an accurate summary of the court document after reading it myself. You can read the official court document yourself here: https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/21084096/favorito-sos-brief-in-response-to-order-of-92021-with-exs-a-and-b.pdf

Prove the NPR affiliate forged court documents, and be an internet star. Or stipulate the documents at the above and below documentcloud links are real, and then consider the following:

Yes, this is Raffensperger's office's response (which just today was, along with other documents accepted as proof by the judge that the "respondents" have "no standing" see here: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21084400-favorito-order-10-13-2021 ). However it (the response by Raffensperger) is a dutifully sworn document sworn under penalty of perjury (because it's an official court document), so one must presume that the "investigators" mentioned in said document (the first link) aren't lying to serve Raffensperger, or any alleged agenda of his, but really are independent in their investigation and/or conclusions. This is simply the only rational way to interpret such statements by these investigators. Unless they are part of some massive pizza-loving, lizard sympathizing whatever the heck else one wishes to pull out of one's hat to dismiss even further the weight of evidence *against* a "stolen election" claim.

Even if you, the reader of this post, aren't at that "place" yet (to acknowledge the reality of court proceedings), please at least consider that you have probably never heard of this fact, that these independent investigators have reached these conclusions, from any right-leaning media you may exclusively rely upon for "news". Please, please, ask yourself why is that? Why have you only heard, at "best", from such sources that this case was "only dismissed for lack of standing". It wasn't. It simply wasn't "only" dismissed for that reason. It was ALSO dismissed because the evidence was indeed examined, and found to be lacking, just like all the other cases in the Twitter thread in my profile.

Please read it, and at least try to consider that the news sources you rely upon might actually be biased themselves. I know it's difficult, I faced the *exact* same difficulty back in Dec 2020, as I detail in my profile. (and let me be CRYSTAL clear, I do NOT deny that there is indeed leftist bias in media such as CNN, MSNBC, the WP, etc, there IS). All I'm saying now, and have been for months now, is that it's sadly become clear to me that some on the right have an equal bias.

Please, just consider this possibility. And always be careful who you trust for any information. That's all I've ever wanted from anyone.

Wonderful! Nothing could make me happier, believe me.

So we should expect to see this “Engelbrecht” in court any day now right, swearing to all he claims on the Internet, in court, under penalty of perjury. Right?

Because to me, if not, if he never makes one court appearance either by himself or under representation, he’s just another Internet scammer, like any other snake oil salesman.

You see that right? That anyone can claim anything they want on the Internet. But it only really matters in court.

At least in a civilized, “law and order” society. By definition of “law and order”.

You didn't read what I posted, did you, FourtySeven?

And you have ABSOLUTELY no idea who Catherine Engelbrecht is, either.

She was famously attacked by the Halfrican and his minion agencies [fibbies, IRS, ATF and OSHA] because she was trying to clean up the vote way back when.

And Unrepresentative ee cummings (Dumb-Maryland), was also working with the IRS to attack Ms. Engelbrecht.

But she beat them ALL in court.

And now she's back, with a Very Large Can of Whupass.

You see that right? That anyone can claim anything they want on the Internet. But it only really matters in court.

Engelbrecht beat federal stooge-judges in federal court.

And now she's dropped a lit stick of dynamite in the laps of the fibbies and the Department of Jesters.

They can't suppress what's coming.

If they sit on it, she's going to dump it ALL - just like Wikileaks.

And the carnage will be magnificent.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.