Posted on 10/05/2021 7:47:30 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
I should have scrolled. Knew someone would use that line.
This is true, I have seen those too. But attributing a specific cancer to a specific action in the way that likens it to bone cancer from licking a radionuclide laced brush to paint a watch dial is not possible at this point.
If you get bone cancer and you licked Strontium laced brushes for painting things for a living, you have a pretty direct causal link.
There is no such link yet between mRNA vaccinations and cander. Some people claim to make a link to the cancer process in itself that is common to cancers, and there may well be a link, but I think it is early.
There are no studies out yet of which I am aware that look at a population of people with cancers and compare it to exposure to mRNA based injections.
If there are enormous increases in cancer deaths, we will know conclusively.
It is for this reason and uncertainty that I feel people are perfectly justified in refusing the vaccination for this reason, and many others, including religious, Constitutional, and so on.
That stance puts me at odds with a lot of people, and my objection to this cancer-causing characterization at this point point in time puts me at odds with others, but I have to navigate by my own star, not what my ideology or personal desires tell me. It is just how I see it.
Re: 78 - he said it last summer, when evidence was out that showed that the virus was not detectable on paper after a few hours as measured in a LAB environment.
The article I am referring to from 7/03/20:
He just lets the mail lie around a day or two before he opens it. In a previous article I am looking for he mentions spraying down mail.
But the point is - that in July of 2020 he was taking steps regarding mail and groceries that the science at the time strongly suggested was not necessary. He did it because he was 79 years old at the time, and I believe his advanced age informs his decision making and risk aversion as a whole more than he realizes.
And the next point is - he answered questions for this article, knowing that many people would read it - and probably copy what he does ,even if they are not of advanced age. As I write often - Fauci is a man in love with his own voice. And he will do public spitballing even it is detrimental to public health.
An article from 10/27/20 where he says letting groceries sit out is no longer needed:
https://bgr.com/science/coronavirus-transmission-risk-groceries-bags-products/
Well every one has to navigate this entire medical environment for themselves.
I am an active participant in my health care and often times have spats with nurses even to one calling me “Nosey” for reading my chart. You be as informed as possible and it’s up to you to ask the questions on what they’re giving you when in their care.
With covid it was made clear from the get go they didn’t know exactly what they were dealing with....and along the way that became quite apparent they were “finding out” and often differed. The same for everything about the shots....and they still don’t know sufficient enough to take responsibility for the outcome of these shots.
So why on earth would a former cancer patient, who’s more than likely had chemo and or radiation put something else in their body that messes with their cells already damaged or destroyed by their former treatment......
Thanks. The reason i asked was cuz I was watching ridiculousness the other night and Rob asked sterling and channel if they sprayed down their mail, and groceries- I hadn’t even heard of folks doing that recently, didn’t know it was still a thing. They are libs on that show, so,they likely follow the advice of fauci
Show some studies. Peer reviewed research or rejected peer reviewed research. Otherwise, it's just jackassin'
There are more and more studies coming out.
Cancer patients on chemotherapy have lower immune response to COVID-19 vaccine, study finds:
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211002/Cancer-patients-on-chemotherapy-have-lower-immune-response-to-COVID-19-vaccine-study-finds.aspx
https://www.newsbreak.com/news/2392251531318/covid-19-vaccine-response-influenced-by-type-of-cancer-treatment
https://ashpublications.org/bloodadvances/article/5/16/3053/476534/Efficacy-of-the-BNT162b2-mRNA-COVID-19-vaccine-in
Our findings are in line with those of prior studies in which R significantly attenuated response to vaccines,... for at least 6 months after completion of treatment and support recommendations to vaccinate patients with B-cell lymphoma with COVID-19 vaccine before therapy or at least 6 months after completing an anti-CD20 Ab–containing therapy.
Note the recommendation before therapy or at least 6 months after (knowing the CDC states the "vaccine" "wanes" at that point).
Don't shoot the messenger.
Agreed and understand.
My concern is that the article stakes it's claim on the cancer being caused by a COVID-19 vaccination (they re unambiguous about that) on what is essentially the experiences of one doctor.
Me likey
I don't want to jump on the "Everybody I hate is gay" wagon, but Garson played a gay character even though he was straight in real life (unless he was gay and playing straight in real life -- it's hard to tell).
Kill shots = 20X cancer activity.
________________________________
https://www.bitchute.com/video/KP1FfkARcoet/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/iGAps9mwOeeO/
Kill shots = 20X cancer activity.
________________________________
https://www.bitchute.com/video/KP1FfkARcoet/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/iGAps9mwOeeO/
Your claim at best is an undemonstrated hypothesis.
Not enough info to suggest that the cancer was due to resurgence, as Dr Ryan Cole has noted among those vax'd. Had he had other cancers in the past? We don't know.
I enjoyed his performance in the 2008 romantic comedy "Beau Jest". He played Sarah Goldman's psychiatrist brother Joel Goldman.
Interesting videos.
But that’s not what they issue is here.
The issue is Tim Brown from Sons of Liberty Media having a headline for his article as follows:
“Dead 5 Months After Potential Pfizer COVID Shot Induced Cancer”
Did it or did it not cause his cancer?
Why is there no peer reviewed or rejected peer reviewed research that talks specifically about COVID-19 vaccinations and them inducing cancer?
Just bitchute videos or other videos.
Why?
BILLIONS of reasons...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.