The problem is they have only been prescribed to the "at risk", so not everyone has access and if the Deep State has it's way it will be even tougher.
What I don't understand is the CDC recommends no early intervention.
Why not use ivermectin and hcq instead of nothing?
They both have a history of safety.
Our local hospital, run by Univ of WV Medical School prescribes ivermectin, doxicycline or z pack, Vit C, famatodine and melatonin on suspicion of covid.
Vit D and a steroid if necessary. Last year, a relative who has had 2 strokes and a heart attack contracted it.
Doctor said go home and go to the ER if you can't breathe.
He continued to decline until a friend, who is an MD, convinced him to try the Zelenko protocol.
He levelled off and on day 4 started to improve.
One week later he was up and about.
Again, why the campaign against these safe drugs?
Aren't they better than nothing?
Have not heard of anyone turned away from REGEN-COV-2 other than terart for insufficient O2. There are a couple of Freepers who have suggested that they have been recently turned away for a too-high BMI, but the Emergency Use suggested these people were High-Risk specifically to include them in REGEN-COV-2 usage.
Anyone who cannot get REGEN-COV-2 who lives within 30 minutes of 3 or 4 infusion centers imo needs a forceful 'advocate' to get on the phone and rattle some cages, and explain the state investigatory/social media outcome to their megabux infusion center refusing to treat the +60 crowd.