Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gavin Newsom Taken to the Legal Woodshed at SCOTUS. Again.
Townhall.com ^ | 13 April A.D. 2021 | Spencer Brown

Posted on 04/13/2021 2:35:30 PM PDT by lightman

California Governor Gavin Newsom's political future is yet to be decided as the recall effort against him mounts, but he's already a loser when it comes to his COVID restrictions surviving review by the United States Supreme Court.

Newsom's disregard for the rights of his fellow citizens amid the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic set up a series of legal showdowns that saw California's governor lose five times in recent months when his restrictive limitations were struck down by SCOTUS.

Three of those five losses came at the hands of one group: the Center for American Liberty.

"These wins have been in the context of religious liberty," explained Mark Trammell, executive director and general counsel at the Center for American Liberty. "The free exercise of religion is a fundamental right. It speaks directly to the dignity of all persons."

When the Center for American Liberty challenged COVID restrictions in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. Newsom and Gish v. Newsom, the Supreme Court ruled against California's chief executive.

It isn't an impossible task to follow science and protect citizens' health without trampling their God-given rights—just look at Governor DeSantis and how he's piloted Florida through the pandemic. Newsom, who didn't seem to get the message, continued his discriminatory actions despite repeated admonishment from the Supreme Court.

That all changed after his most recent legal defeat. Late last week, the Supreme Court handed the Center for American Liberty another victory in Tandon v. Newsom, completing the group's hat trick against California's governor. Trammell was bullish on the message Newsom's losing record at SCOTUS telegraphs to other states:

"It is a very big deal and I think it sends a clear signal to governors across the country that the Court will not tolerate restrictions on the free exercise of religion."

Newsom's flaws as a leader during COVID were abundantly clear after being outed for enjoying a royally hypocritical dinner at the French Laundry while he kept Californians and their businesses locked down. But Newsom's disregard for the rights of his citizens affected more than dining options. "It takes an incredible amount of hubris and a complete disregard for the Constitution to burden religious expression in one’s own home; but that didn’t stop Gavin Newsom who for a year leveraged the full force of the state government to discriminate against the faith community," remarked Trammell.

Apparently unwilling to stay on the legal defeat hamster wheel for another rotation, Governor Newsom is now, finally, backing down.

On Monday, it was announced that he would lift all restrictions on religious gatherings, citing "recent judicial rulings," according to California's online COVID guidance portal.

Harmeet Dhillon, founder and CEO of the Center for American Liberty called Newsom's decision "incredibly gratifying" in a statement before adding that her group "will not relent until we have sufficient precedent from the courts prohibiting this civil liberties crisis from ever happening again."

Dhillon, who is a frequent guest on cable news and once represented my previous employer in a successful free speech lawsuit against UC Berkeley, is not herself a member of the religious entities she advocated for in court. Born in India and raised in a devout Sikh family, Dhillon's legal defense of the liberty of others offers a stark contrast to Newsom and his evident belief in 'freedom for me but not for thee.'


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; california; church; firstamendment; freedomofreligion; newsome; scotus
On Monday, it was announced that he would lift all restrictions on religious gatherings citing "recent judicial rulings," according to California's online COVID guidance portal.

Hallelujah!

1 posted on 04/13/2021 2:35:30 PM PDT by lightman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lightman

What about his absurd mask and other lockdown/closing mandates?


2 posted on 04/13/2021 2:39:54 PM PDT by Jane Long (America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation 🙏🏻🇺🇸)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

So, what about those folks who were praying before their meal at the Tinhorn Flats Saloon.

Those were religious gatherings.


3 posted on 04/13/2021 2:42:56 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (This is not /s. It is just as viable as any MSM 'information', maybe more so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman
Last summer a Federal judge in Boston struck down one of the orders of the Massachusetts Governor,Charlie Baker,a Trump hating RINO.The order was that gun shops and gun ranges were "non essential" and therefore could not open.

And IIRC a Federal judge in Pennsylvania,in a 60 page ruling,struck down many of the orders of the state's Trump hating Rat Governor...calling them breathtaking violations of basic Constitutional rights.

4 posted on 04/13/2021 2:43:03 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Trump: "They're After You. I'm Just In The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Anyone know what the count was at the Supreme Court???


5 posted on 04/13/2021 2:49:22 PM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

How’s that recall going?


6 posted on 04/13/2021 2:51:32 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Heating up so far as I know.

I’m in Pennsyltucky.


7 posted on 04/13/2021 3:11:37 PM PDT by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Laws mean nothing to the spawn and spray of Pelosi.


8 posted on 04/13/2021 3:22:50 PM PDT by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lightman

The Calif Legislature is also talking about revealing all names, & other info of every person who signed the recall petition.


9 posted on 04/13/2021 3:55:59 PM PDT by ridesthemiles ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Time to go back to harrassing nuns and cake shops.


10 posted on 04/13/2021 4:33:02 PM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Source?


11 posted on 04/13/2021 4:48:38 PM PDT by Houmatt (Welcome to the USSA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Every single state with nazi governors should be taken to court. Pathway to victory already set.


12 posted on 04/13/2021 5:45:10 PM PDT by NWFree (Socialism is legalized plunder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Well they can print my NAME, ADDRESS, and TELEPHONE NUMBER on ever BILLBOARD in the state if they want to, I don’t care.

It’s a very long, bumpy, dirt road to my house and VERY DEFENSABLE!

Just wish I could have signed the recall petition 20 or 30 times, kind of like PROG/LIB/DEM/COMMIE/STALINIST’s vote.


13 posted on 04/13/2021 6:16:49 PM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson