[Repeal 16-17]

This case is one of the reason the Demon-crats want to pack the Court.

[JohnBrowdie]

and packing the court is a real possibility now that we lost the senate.

but, man, that boycott in the runoff made us feel really good about ourselves, so what’s the bother of a life under tyranny?

temper tantrums rock.

[Publius]

...argued that the deadline, which was first set for 1979 and later extended to 1982, was not binding.

Of course it's binding. The Supreme Court's 1921 decision in Dillon v. Gloss makes it binding.

[monkeyshine]

Where does the judge stand on the infield fly rule?

[Brilliant]

We already have laws on the books prohibiting sex discrimination. That is one of the reasons it did not pass. Another reason is that it became clear that the ERA would require that women be drafted the same as men and that they be treated the same in the military. People did not want their daughters to be drafted, particularly given that we were still in Vietnam.

[WASCWatch]

If it was to ever pass, given the pro-woman sexist policies of big business and government, it will be men who will be filing most of the lawsuits.a

[eyeamok]

This is what is wrong with the Judiciary, The Amendment Clearly had a Time Limit, Everyone knew it, the 3 Demonrat Lawyer Attorney Generals all Knew it. The Wussy Judge Should have Sanctioned All 3 of them Severely. a $10,000 Sanction gets you DISBARRED, the Judge should have Sanctioned ALL of them $25,000 for Abuse of Process.

[wny]

Women already have equal rights. Name one “right” men have that women do not.

I’ll wait....

[Herakles]

To bad! Mommy and sis would be forced to do the crappy things men are force to do.

[Blood of Tyrants]

Hell, they are enacting a super ERA by legislation in HR5.