Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Holy Grail" – Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatments Reverse Aging Process in First Clinical Trial
SciTechDaily ^ | 19 January 2021 | Tel Aviv University

Posted on 01/19/2021 9:22:33 AM PST by zeestephen

The researchers exposed 35 healthy individuals aged 64 or over to a series of 60 hyperbaric sessions over a period of 90 days...The findings indicated that the treatments actually reversed the aging process in two of its major aspects: The telomeres at the ends of the chromosomes grew longer instead of shorter, at a rate of 20%-38% for the different cell types; and the percentage of senescent cells in the overall cell population was reduced significantly – by 11%-37% depending on cell type...The paper was published in Aging on November 18, 2020.

(Excerpt) Read more at scitechdaily.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hyperbaricoxygen; longevity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: Gator113

Try it. It is a simple cheap experiment. There is such a thing as “verifiable reality,” or “self-evident truth.”

The media wants you to have to go through them — as the exclusive gateway of truth — which we know is self-serving, for whomever pays them to propagate their (marketing) message. That’s what the old media used to do — anoint those experts, and suppress, censor, banish anyone else. Does that have a familiar ring?


41 posted on 01/19/2021 1:31:29 PM PST by MikeHu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Actually, that technology and insight has been around for at least 50-100 years — so for somebody to be claiming it as “initial trials” is ignorance of most alternatives, and a grab for patent rights.

Longevity is a hot topic — especially among those with money that can last forever — but their bodies and certainly their brains might not. Muscle atrophy (sarcopenia) is part of that same problem — because it is pretty meaningless to talk about the neuro- without the -muscular, or for that matter, cardio- without the -vascular because none can exist in isolation.

But the 20th century mentality of dividing, fragmenting, and specialization — thinking that was the road to progress falls way short of a 21st world view in which all things are related to everything else.

The hardest things to see are the air we breathe, the water we drink (and vaporize), and the obvious realization that oxygen is not a foe, but the most necessary thing for animal life — and maybe enhancing it as much as practical, is not a bad idea. We seem to miss things greatly, only when it is gone.


42 posted on 01/19/2021 1:45:41 PM PST by MikeHu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MikeHu
We seem to miss things greatly, only when it is gone.

Well, a lot of folks in this country are about to find that out.

43 posted on 01/19/2021 1:48:04 PM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
Well, the Doc certainly wasn't as smart as you......

Here's how it works:

Radiation treatment makes the bones brittle and susceptible to fracture during anchor implants in the jaw.

The hyperbaric chamber treatment promotes oxygenation and restoration of the bone integrity to provide for a safe anchor emplacement.

44 posted on 01/19/2021 1:51:17 PM PST by G Larry (Authority is vested in those to whom it applies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

If you say so. If you want a second opinion, go see a Chiropractor..........


45 posted on 01/19/2021 1:58:38 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
I got a 2nd and 3rd opinion as well as conducting my own research among my family of Doctors and Nurses.

But thanks for assuming we're all idiots.

46 posted on 01/19/2021 2:00:07 PM PST by G Larry (Authority is vested in those to whom it applies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
But thanks for assuming we're all idiots.

You're welcome.........any time.

47 posted on 01/19/2021 2:28:53 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: MikeHu

Pure oxygen is toxic. Read up on it


48 posted on 01/19/2021 4:33:59 PM PST by nikos1121 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Grognard49

100% O2 under pressure my friend


49 posted on 01/19/2021 4:34:53 PM PST by nikos1121 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Better than reading up on it, is to do the experiment yourself. That’s what makes it “scientific” or the scientific method — that anybody can run the experiment and verify the results for themselves. Otherwise, one is just accepting authority — and not that one has ever discovered any truth for themselves.

Besides, I did not advocate using pure oxygen — which as a practical matter is inaccessible to most people, nor did I advocate forcing it into the body under pressure. I simply said one could enhance the oxygen in one’s environment in a very simple, cheap, undeniably effective manner — with all kinds of unanticipated benefits — including maintaining a hygienic environment in this manner. Then breathing those vapors into the body, has that same effect of enhancing the body’s ability to handle bacteria, viruses, fungi, mold spores, allergens, etc. — before spending one’s fortune treating each symptom as though it is unrelated to every other.


50 posted on 01/19/2021 6:28:56 PM PST by MikeHu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: MikeHu

Why 3% hydrogen peroxide? Food grade?


51 posted on 01/19/2021 6:40:42 PM PST by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

3% because it is readily and cheaply available. And then when you dilute it 1:50, that makes it cost almost nothing.

35% is cost-prohibitive except for manufacturing activity including food processing. That level of purity is not necessary as far as I have literature on.

And then you know that pure hydrogen peroxide is rocket fuel — which I doubt that many will encounter in their lives — which of course is supremely toxic also.


52 posted on 01/19/2021 6:52:32 PM PST by MikeHu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Joe would put a really big shoo... in his mouth


53 posted on 01/19/2021 6:57:35 PM PST by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MikeHu

I have a cpap. It really does s a great machine whether you have sleep apnea or not. Hook it up to 100 % O2 and see what happens.

The HBO is 100% at 2 atmospheric pressure. You have to have someone with you at all times. It’s e true soy flammable. You need to be naked inside.


54 posted on 01/20/2021 3:15:49 AM PST by nikos1121 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MikeHu

I’m sorry trying to write w cell phone.

Bottom m line

Of course this would work. But you would need to reduce costs and method.


55 posted on 01/20/2021 3:20:54 AM PST by nikos1121 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MikeHu
Well before the Flood the ancients lived to extraordinarily long ages. Related?

Did more oxygen and pressure in the pre-flood world have health benefits?

Brian Young  ·  Jul 30, 2017

While there is much we cannot say for certain about the world before Noah’s flood, we do know that the Bible tells us that it was much different than today. People were living to more than 900 years of age!

According to the fossil record, many plants and animals were of much greater size than those we see today. Dragonflies had wingspans of over 3 feet, cockroaches were 18 inches long and cattails grew to be 60 feet tall. While we may never know for sure why all of these things occurred, we know that when God said His creation was “very good,” it was indeed, very good.

Modern scientific discoveries may give us some clues as to why the pre-flood world was so different. Scientists have discovered air bubbles that have been trapped in fossilized amber (tree sap). As the tree sap rolled down the side of the tree, it captured the atmosphere in these air bubbles, which when analyzed reveals an earlier atmosphere had about 35 percent oxygen compared to today's 21 percent...

Not only is this artificial “atmosphere” good for the body, it also seems to be wonderful for plants. At Keio University in Tokyo, Japan, Dr. Kei Mori placed a cherry tomato plant in a similar chamber where he filtered out ultraviolet light and increased the pressure so the plant would take in carbon dioxide faster. The results were astounding. In two years his cherry tomato plant was 14 feet tall and had over 900 tomatoes that were baseball size. The plant went on to be over 45 feet tall and yielded around 15,000 tomatoes. More: https://samaritanministries.org/blog/did-more-oxygen-and-pressure-in-the-pre-flood-world-have-health-benefits


56 posted on 01/20/2021 8:26:25 AM PST by daniel1212 (Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MikeHu
I’ve gotten that same effect vaporizing diluted 3% hydrogen peroxide 1:50 parts filtered water.

Thanks. Did you use the pre-diluted H2O2 with its additives or 35% Food Grade (as here https://www.intothegardenofeden.com/35-food-grade-hydrogen-peroxide diluted


57 posted on 01/20/2021 8:32:02 AM PST by daniel1212 (Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121; daniel1212

While I have no doubt that different variations on the theme might be better or worse — what I’ve looked for is the 5% that gives me 95% of the effects — and that is good enough for my purposes. I’m not a perfectionist or purist — because I’m simply interested in that low-hanging fruit (5%) that provides with most of the benefits — so that my cost to benefit ratio is a slam-dunk why not?

As primarily a bodybuilder most of my 70+ years of life, while my peers were asking how can I give 110%, or other such nonsense — which of course makes many vulnerable to premature heart and other failures of the human body, I asked the much more valuable question of what 5% of any doing, gives one 95% of the results — and move on to identify the next 5%, because moving from 95% to 96% will usually require twice the expenditure of effort for a barely negligible increased benefit.

And there is only so much time in the day and one’s life that one has to be as extremely efficient at everything, to get the best part (95%) of it done — and not simply become more and more obsessive/compulsive about these things. Other people are built for that — but I’m kind of generalist who doesn’t want to get too hung up on the exact details.

So while I’m aware of the literature that says that one needs 100% or something is worthless, or one has to achieve precise zero —I prefer to operate in the real world of finding out what is mostly true and mostly false — for my purposes — which is what gets one to 100, with no signs of aging — and not like the many stars who die prematurely thinking they are on the “fast track” — ie. the Arnolds, Bruce Lee, World’s Strongest Man, Superstars, etc. — and wonder what went wrong. Why does what seemed to work when they were younger, not work anymore? Maybe it never did — while one missed entirely, what did.

A lot of modern science is conducted in that way — of already knowing what they want to “prove” and only seeing that, and totally discarding what may be of greater significance that they could not even imagine could possibly be happening.


58 posted on 01/20/2021 12:08:46 PM PST by MikeHu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

59 posted on 01/20/2021 12:13:57 PM PST by newfreep (The Communist/DNC VOTER FRAUD is Trump's ONLY opponent in 2020 election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MikeHu
While I have no doubt that different variations on the theme might be better or worse — what I’ve looked for is the 5% that gives me 95% of the effects — and that is good enough for my purposes. I’m not a perfectionist or purist — because I’m simply interested in that low-hanging fruit (5%) that provides with most of the benefits — so that my cost to benefit ratio is a slam-dunk why not?

I was just asking if you use the pre-diluted H2O2 with its additives or 35% Food Grade. I wonder if the latter can be even cheaper than store bought H202 after diluting it it down (1 and ¼ cups of 35% food grade hydrogen peroxide with 14 and ¾ cups of water).

As primarily a bodybuilder most of my 70+ years of life, while my peers were asking how can I give 110%, or other such nonsense — which of course makes many vulnerable to premature heart and other failures of the human body, I asked the much more valuable question of what 5% of any doing, gives one 95% of the results — and move on to identify the next 5%, because moving from 95% to 96% will usually require twice the expenditure of effort for a barely negligible increased benefit.

I do not really understand this, but for years I often played hard heart-pounding sports with teens and kids in the neighbor, plus shoveling snow, thanks be to God (though at almost 69 my arthritis leaves me sore), but I thought that such could help make one less vulnerable to premature heart and other failures.

60 posted on 01/20/2021 1:26:21 PM PST by daniel1212 (Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned + destitute sinner + trust Him to save + be baptized+follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson