Can you check this thread now and then - and tweet James Woods with any evidences of cheating that we find on FR?
I actually don’t know how to do that on twitter.
MUST READ
https://macris.substack.com/p/why-trump-will-triumph-in-pa-litigation
Excerpt:
Thus the situation as it stands is that there is still a petition before the Supreme Court to review the situation in Pennsylvania, it just refused to do so before the election.
Now that raises the question: Whats the situation in Pennsylvania? Lets work through that.
In 2019, the PA legislature passed a law called Act 77 that permitted all voters to cast their ballots by mail but (in Justice Alitos words) unambiguously required that all mailed ballots be received by 8 p.m. on election day. The exact text is 2019 Pa. Leg. Serv. Act 2019-77, which stated: No absentee ballot under this subsection shall be counted which is received in the office of the county board of elections later than eight o’clock P.M. on the day of the primary or election. I agree with Justice Alito: That is unambiguous.
Act 77 also provided that if this portion of the law was invalidated, that much of the rest of Act 77, including its liberalization of mail-in voting, would also be void. The exact text is: Sections 1, 2, 3, 3.2, 4, 5, 5.1, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 12 of this act are nonseverable. If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remaining provisions or applications of this act are void.
To again put this into common English, the Pennsylvania legislature passed a law that said mail-in ballots had to arrive by 8PM on election day to be counted, and then said that if the Court over-ruled that law, the entire law that permitted mail-in ballots was invalid.
In the face of this clear text, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, by a vote of four to three, made the following decrees, summarized here by SCOTUS:
Mailed ballots dont need to be received by a election day. Instead, ballots can be accepted if they are postmarked on or before election day and are received within three days thereafter. Note that this is directly contravenes the text above.
A mailed ballot with no postmark, or an illegible postmark, must be regarded as timely if it is received by that same date.
In doing so, PAs high court expressly acknowledged that the statutory provision mandating receipt by election day was unambiguous and conceded the law was constitutional, but still re-wrote the law because it thought it needed to do so in the face of a natural disaster. It justified its right to do so under the Free and Equal Elections Cause of the PA State Constitution.