My question is if God does not leave us to our own destruction and grants us a reprieve this election what do we do with it and where do we go from there.
And then, what happens when they have turned 25 and myelinated their prefrontal cortex? Do they then see consequences?
Use your dildo instead of your Bible, play with your girlfriend, pretend you are a man, die and go straight...to hell.
Sorry, you can not accept Jesus and screw your female partner, pick one.
Marxist deconstruction of a society is multifaceted and relentless.
The other 70% are attractive.
The one positive is there goes a whole bunch of legacy Dim voters and corrupt Dim pols.
Women under 25 ID themselves as a lot of goofy things, and have for centuries.
In this case it is likely cases of LUGs (lesbians until graduation)or “bisexual” just to make them more “attractive” to dude-bros and pervy old men.
I’m thinking the pollster came up to women in bars and asked them, “Do you want to f*** a real man?” And 30% said they were Lesbians.
sexual identification is a choice and depends on the context
Lesbianism is a practical application of feminism. So is heterosexual female carousel-riding. Both are expensive opportunity-wasters to squander young women’s finite peak years for pair-bonding and starting families.
There’s plenty of time for them to live with what’s left after their prime years are gone forever. Some will justify their choices and mislead the next generation of young females into following down the same path. Some will subside into bitterness. Some will wake up to how they were conned after it’s too late. Maybe some of them snap out of it in time to salvage some goodness and excuse their former oat-sowing as a harmless stage to younger women who won’t be so lucky.
There’s a lot of unnecessary confusion and waste going on in our culture these days.
We have not, as a society, been raising boys to become husbands for many years.
The truth is 30% of the 'gay community' regrets their decision to come out as gay.
The word “sandwich” comes to mind...
OMG, a POLL! Hey, it’s gotta be right since it’s a POLL!
Romans 1 in stereo. It will not be long now.
What I see is a ‘herd mentality’ in action. Females are more social than males, this is both by biology and anthropology. Females make the home by being the child-bearers and child carers. Safe homes are not single homes but are rather communities. Is this article not pointing out that communities can now be formed by same-sex partners?
Current society has, since the 1960s, emphasized that hippy mantra of “Do your own thing”! What has changed from the generations prior to this 60s change is the ABILITY to live a single life. Previously, single-hood was impractical to the point of failure/fatality for multiple and obvious reasons; manual labor, diseases and majority rural agricultural subsistence. New Age idiocy about the old social norms IGNORES FACTS about their very real benefits for the conditions.
Now, in this age of very real abundance, the benefit perception has swung to a near opposite. Short term and multiple relationships show little immediate damage to the individual or society (note ‘immediate’ here) while long term relationships are almost a surprise when revealed. What I do see is an actual deprecation of what used to ‘normal’ as so many things highlight dangers of spousal abuse while giving acceptance to same-sex relations EVEN WHEN those have much the same abuses. However, in my view, a lot of what we see is is short-sided and superficial AND like this article identifies, a societal disruptor.
I speak now from a personal perspective, I am a senior male who never formed a relationship because of a lot of things personal and otherwise. I have all of the worldly goods I will ever need, I have friendships but I have run out of (outlived) family. While I know that I probably missed opportunities in the past, at this point all that does is provoke the regret. I cannot even be buried next to family as they are all in a National Cemetery and I was 4F due to eyesight. I am decidedly unhappy on this aspect of my life.
When this generation of LGBT women and their unmatched males get older, what kind of society will they make? I can see the causes but the outcomes baffle me, no, they scare me! By the Bible and the Iliad and the Hindu & China histories, society was some variation of male to female bonding over the past 12k years at the very least. Can this be successfully replaced and functional in mere decades?
So much for that 2 percent that’s always touted. Oops.
Not sure if that is true, but why does this bother people? It doesn’t bother me. Wife and I have gay relatives. ConservaTeen has gay friends, no biggie. Much more important issues we should look at.
It’s easier for ugly liberal girls to pick up uglier liberal girls.
“Shock poll claims 30% of U.S. women under 25 identify as LGBT: dire implications”
For 90% of them, it’s just a men-hating phase they go through. Kind of like when boys hate girls, prior to puberty. For the other 10% of them, they never outgrow it.
Have you been in the high school and college? Young men aren’t exactly displaying themselves as masculine girl bait.