Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dies at 87
NYT ^ | Sep 18, 2020

Posted on 09/19/2020 5:49:51 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?

WASHINGTON — Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died on Friday of “complications of metastatic pancreas cancer,” the Supreme Court announced....

Democrats say this is hairsplitting hypocrisy that damages the legitimacy of the court. But they may have little practical power to stop a third Trump nominee after changes in Senate rules on filibusters on nominations. All it takes now is a majority vote to confirm judicial nominees.....

During the Obama administration, some liberals urged Justice Ginsburg to step down so that President Barack Obama could name her successor. She rejected the advice.

She was critical of Mr. Trump during the 2016 campaign, and he responded that “her mind is shot” and said she should resign. She later said she had made a mistake in publicly commenting on a candidate and promised to be more “circumspect” in the future.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0searchfirst; ginsburg; ijustwokeup; postedseveraltimes; rgb; scotus; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: where's_the_Outrage?

41 posted on 09/19/2020 6:59:11 AM PDT by null and void (It WON'T be a Biden presidency, the Dems do NOT need him. They just need the office. ~ Blueflag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conserv
Morons at the NYT are facing reality a little early.


42 posted on 09/19/2020 7:01:25 AM PDT by null and void (It WON'T be a Biden presidency, the Dems do NOT need him. They just need the office. ~ Blueflag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 9422WMR

12 minutes.


43 posted on 09/19/2020 7:02:23 AM PDT by null and void (It WON'T be a Biden presidency, the Dems do NOT need him. They just need the office. ~ Blueflag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
What would the Dems do if the tables were reversed? Go for the Gold!

There's no question what they would do.

Even Schumer agrees!


44 posted on 09/19/2020 7:09:02 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

45 posted on 09/19/2020 7:11:37 AM PDT by ThE_RiPpEr. (The Obamanation is over - Free at last, free at last, thank God almighty we are free at last)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
What would the Dems do if the tables were reversed?

They tried to spy on him, they tried to investigate him, they tried to impeach him, they lied about him, they lied about his previous pick to the Supreme Court ...

If the tables were reversed ... they would find the most liberal activist judge and ram her down our throat without hesitation.

I for one will be disappointed if Mitch is not at the White House this weekend ... and the pick does not come by Tuesday or Wednesday.

46 posted on 09/19/2020 7:39:32 AM PDT by dartuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

How does that work? Is a majority of Senators voting all that is required or does it take a majority of the full 100 Senators?


47 posted on 09/19/2020 8:04:36 AM PDT by libertylover (Election 2020: Make America Great Again or Burn it to the Ground. Choose one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertylover

There are 51 Republicans and 49 Dems/Independents, what if 2 Rinos abstained?

Then the vote could be:

50 R’s (VP Vote)
49 D’s
2 Abstains

That would constitute a simple majority IMHO.


48 posted on 09/19/2020 8:20:52 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage? (Drain the Swamp. Build the Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Out freaking standing!!!!

I hope that evil witch is enjoying her eternal swim in the lake of burning liquid sulphur.


49 posted on 09/19/2020 9:08:16 AM PDT by 2CAVTrooper (BLM= Baby Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Didn't see where the NYT was posted with the news.

And it didn't happen until the NYT says it did?

50 posted on 09/19/2020 11:01:55 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFB-XYZ

8 times (so far) is my count.


51 posted on 09/19/2020 11:09:41 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Since all it takes is a majority the RINOs that say they will not approve a Trump nominee should abstain instead of voting against.

You're thinking of "plurality" - for getting a majority, an abstention is as bad as a nay.

52 posted on 09/19/2020 11:12:22 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson