Posted on 05/13/2020 11:56:52 AM PDT by RandFan
@RandPaul
Yesterday I wrote to DNI @RichardGrenell requesting the names of those who were involved in Gen Flynn’s unmasking. Today I received the shocking reply that @JoeBiden and many others knew! What did President Obama know? I am inviting DNI Grenell to testify next week in the Senate
[Click excerpt link for letter]
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
He said yesterday he didn’t know anything about the Flynn situation even though he was in the meeting with Obama,now it’s not illegal to unmask but it is a felony to leak it to the media,so check their emails and phone calls
What delicious irony it would be if the day EVER comes when Biteme is subpeonad to testify he weasles out on grounds of insanity
Rand speaking to the press:
.
@RandPaul: “Remember we went through this thing called impeachment? They said President @realDonaldTrump was using the govt to go after a political opponent? This is VP Biden using the spying powers of the US to go after a political opponent. He’s caught red-handed here.”
https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1260647731355422730
When asked to comment Biden told reporters “I had nothing to do with Flynn’s unmasking. In fact I think he definitely needs to keep his mask on. Especially in Costco or Walmart.”
Trump should demand their Passports NOW.
That would be awesome!!
Lol!
bttt
As I understand it, this is a Senatorial procedural rule to allow the subject to be considered again in the future:
“As Sarah Binder, a Senate rules expert at George Washington University, explained, it’s not that the majority leader has to vote no. It’s that somebody on the winning side of the cloture vote — in this case, the side voting against cloture — has to file a “motion to reconsider” if the matter is to be taken up again. “I suppose the broader parliamentary principle here is that it would be somewhat unfair to give someone on the losing side of a question a second bite at the apple,” Binder explains. So the rules provide for senators whose opinion has changed to motion for another vote, whereas those whose opinion stays the same don’t get to keep filing to reconsider.”
If my reading of this is incorrect, maybe someone who has more knowledge of Senate rules and procedure adjust my understanding.
They only needed 60. Ditch could have chosen to be #60.
Rand says Comey, Clapper, Brennan and the whole Obama gang knew
https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1260644745132589057
What’s most shocking to me is this is only the unmasking of LtG Flynn. I’ll bet plenty more Trump surrogates were unmasked during the same time frame.
letter at link with listed names
This has to be so annoying to Barr. He went out of his way to ignore the obviously illegal operation done against Flynn within his own department and only pulled the charges after the leaks were so damaging to FBI/DOJ that he wanted them to stop even if Flynn walked free. Back to status quo. Then this Grennell guy keeps releasing more embarassing stuff that Barr has to now go on TV and pretend to be outraged about before suddenly forgetting it exists.
“Fist Grinnell with testify”.
Would someone please translate that into English?
https://twitter.com/CBS_Herridge/status/1260635872271228928
Catherine Herridge @CBS_Herridge
SCOOP @CBSNews obtains @RichardGrenell notification to congress declassified “unmasking list” Flynn between late 2016 and January 2017 - Read 3 pages provided by NSA here
Biden’s hands are dirty and his fingers are all over the Flynn case.
This is great..would have to be the Senate, but invite Obama to tratify, and when he says no, subpoena him.
He claimed to know nothing about it.
He’s in big trouble!
Another question Trump can ask Biden in the Debate (that will not happen). Trump has a long list now, Hunter, Tara, Now Flynn.
Biden lost his mind. This is sick stuff.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
