Senate Impeachment Trial LIVE - day 3

[Jim Robinson]

Senate Impeachment Trial LIVE - day 3

[EQAndyBuzz]

Hurts like a b*tch. Still less pain than watching this fustercluck.

[thingumbob]

Thanks for takin the flak for the rest of us so we can just read this thread.

Massive headache. Can't stand the fingernails on the chalkboard.

[PackersFan]

However many it is, it’s too many. And just think, they would have finished tonight if not for Collins and the other RINOs who forced the rules change.

[spokeshave]

I swear, this trial is not unlike looking at a .gif on Facebook.

Yeah...and someone up thread said it was a Seinfeld trial

as in a Seinfeld "shrinkage" event...shrinkage of credibility in this case.

[Joined2Justify]

To paraphrase something I heard on Howie today:

“This is like getting a long lecture on fire safety. From an arsonist.”

[goldstategop]

The Republican moderates are getting a lesson on what insisting on six instead of four days has really amounted to.

Thank God this Democrat circus will finally end tomorrow night.

[noexcuses]

Been popping into coverage off snd on all day....just popped back in to hear now let’s review have we have heard.

[pollywog]

I can’t stand Bair, Wallace and the rest!!!
Finally subscribed to OAN....I don’t go to Fox until Hannity comes on.... then I can watch until Shannon Breams signs off. Even then sometimes I get sick of it all.

[Magnum44]

“This is like getting a long lecture on fire safety. From an arsonist.”

Let me tell you something....

[Political Junkie Too]

Really silly and specious on so many levels.

So name some.

-PJ

[Freee-dame]

If there were only four days, the defense would have had Friday and Saturday, very weak days for TV viewing. It is better to have Saturday, Monday and Tuesday. If our lawyers are smart, and I think that they are, they will time their sessions well.

[Political Junkie Too]

For me, "legit" is not the first adjective that comes to mind to describe CNN or Crowdstrike…

In the context provided, "legit" meant that it was a company properly founded and operating within regulations. It said nothing about the partisan opinions about the products it produces.

It's like saying that RJ Reynolds is not legit because people don't like smoking (or Joe Camel), or that Budweiser is not legit because people don't like drinking, or that Smith & Wesson is not legit because people don't like guns.

-PJ

[Jim W N]

DUMP THIS WHOLE FREAKING THING!

NOW!!!

DISMISS THIS UTTER NON-CASE!!!

[Jim W N]

DUMP THIS WHOLE FREAKING THING!

NOW!!!

DISMISS THIS UTTER NON-CASE!!!

Then indict the criminals who conducted this unconstitutional and illegal investigation!

[PackersFan]

Oh no, we can’t do that because if we did, Romney, Collins, and Murkowski might be labeled “unfair” by the Dems/MSM, and that would be their worst nightmare.

[JLAGRAYFOX]

Thanks...much appreciated!!!

[McGavin999]

I’m just praying our team plays the last part of the Mike Turner/Sondland questioning where Mike Turner gets Sondland to admit it was presumption.

[CJ Wolf]

I heard a quick blurb on the local radio and was almost pulled over for sleepy driving. Glad it was a quick blurb.

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

Or Planned Parenthood because some people think abortion on demand is wrong? Also remember what was legal in the 19th century. OK, maybe what CNN does is technically legal most of the time? We can agree on that. CNN is not MS-13. I will also agree that we could not have a viable legal framework based on 300 million individual opinions of right and wrong. While I admit that Crowdstrike has not been proven to have committed crimes, I believe it has played a key role in a despicable act, and maybe the people who work there are not aware of it.

[AndyJackson]

Senate Impeachment Trial LIVE

It's dead, Jim.