Posted on 09/14/2019 10:22:31 AM PDT by Missouri gal
Sen. Kamala Harris' debate performance on Thursday fails to impress many of her party's big money donors and fails to win over some financiers who were on the fence about her candidacy... One source said Friday they had been having trouble persuading their donors to back her candidacy before the debate. The negative opinion didn't change after the debate. "I don't think anything has changed, and it's been grim," this person said.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I wonder how many black men would be excited to vote for Kamala Harris.
Maybe she should sleep with a few donors. Worked fine with Willie Brown.
“Kamala Harris’ debate performance fails to sway big money donors”
Maybe if she also screams bout taking ARs and AKs from the general population, she’ll get millions from the MEXICAN CARTELS as a THANK YOU for giving them the whole gun market ?
Some of these dems just don’t think a day ahead !
I see what you did there
The Marxists candidate has already been picked. We haven’t been told who it is yet.
Yep, I’m busted......... plead guilty.....
> Dems are down to Biden, Warren, Sanders, Hillary and Michelle. <
I agree. And Hillary in particular is hoping for a brokered convention. I’ll bet she’s already drawing up a list of cabinet appointees. Or maybe she’ll just use the one left over from 2016.
Amen to that. Personally, I want Warren — it should be delicious to see DJT humiliate her at the debates.
Harris is clearly fading as a candidate, but I still consider her the most dangerous occupant of the RAT clown car.
Her power lust is as great as Hillary’s, if not more so. She should never be allowed within shouting distance of any position of public trust.
To busy riding the staff to mount the podium.
I see what you did there!
I agree. Harris would relish rounding us up and eliminating us. That’s not an exaggeration, either.
I think the last convention of either party, to go more than one ballot, was in 1952, I think I heard?
With so many Democrats stumbling around running, a brokered convention with no candidate getting a majority seems a major possibility.
Remember that delegates in a convention pledged to a specific candidate, are only bound to vote that way on the 1st ballot. If it goes to a 2nd ballot, all bets are off.
And that’s where someone such as Hillary can slide in, and get the nomination without ever having had to run in the primaries and caucuses.
Well, you know, she won the GA governor’s race before they stole it from her by election fraud. Apparently, GA Dems area so incompetent they can’t remember which party they’re manufacturing votes for.
She comes off as so annoying I can’t believe Willie Brown could stand her for 30 mins at a time.
Well at least she’s over the hump of this big debate and can try to master the next one, as long as the moderator isn’t a jerk.
heard people say, that the Kerry-Edwards ticket of 2004, is probably going to be the last Democrat ticket with two white heterosexual men on it.
Can you say "amateur porn videos of a US presidential candidate"?
> Remember that delegates in a convention pledged to a specific candidate, are only bound to vote that way on the 1st ballot. If it goes to a 2nd ballot, all bets are off. <
And as per the current Democrat party rules, the superdelegates can vote starting with the 2nd ballot. And I’m guessing that a lot of those guys are friends with the Clintons.
She make the same offer as Madonna. It work wonders on Willy Brown and for her career..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.