Posted on 08/29/2019 8:20:02 AM PDT by rktman
(QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY) -- If the 2020 presidential election were held today, 54 percent of registered voters say that they would vote for former Vice President Joe Biden, while only 38 percent would vote for President Trump. Matchups against other top Democrats show:
Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders topping Trump 53 - 39 percent;Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren ahead of Trump 52 - 40 percent;California Sen. Kamala Harris beating Trump 51 - 40 percent;South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg leading with 49 percent to Trump's 40 percent.
Looking at all of the matchups, President Trump is stuck between 38 and 40 percent of the vote. These low numbers may partly be explained by a lack of support among white women, a key voting bloc that voted for Trump in the 2016 election. Today, white women go for the Democratic candidate by double digits in every scenario. Though it is a long 14 months until Election Day, Trump's vulnerability among this important voting group does not bode well for him.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
This time next year, Texas will be in play. I’m just a blue collar worker scraping by, not an expert, but that’s my take on it.
Besides, Trump is not winning against the Deep State, and he’s done nothing about voter fraud. Nothing. Yes, it’s a defeatist attitude, but I am not seeing victory or ‘winning’. Every supposed ‘win’ we get, the Deep State slaps us upside the head with a 10 loss reality check.
Well, if the economy didn’t suck so bad that all might be true.......... Oh. LOL! As in any time, it’s awesome for some and sucks for some. The way of the world right?
I guess I’m going to be handing out a lot of Steaming Pantload Awards between now and the election
Zog’s magic sauce
Glug glug glug
If california and new york are among the dozen states then it is a biased poll. Kick out the two states the democrats can count on. If the democrats lose those two states they will lose no matter what and winning those two states is nor enough to guaranty a democrat-socialist victory.
*yawn*
I’m waiting for President Hillary Clinton’s comments on the poll.
Just read an excerpted article from The Atlantic quoting a research study which concluded that (drumroll, please) owners of multiple firearms are far more likely to be politically active about gun control than owners of just one gun.
Stop the presses! Hoodathunkit! Call Captain Obvious!
After many paragraphs of tub-thumping “gun control works!” and “97% of Americans want an assault weapons ban!” and “When is America going to join the civilized world about limiting guns!?” the article quoted some lame statistics with some more lame percentages.
It ended with their survey methodology: phone polling, both cellphone & landline, and responses to poll questions.....
Yeah, right. As though an anonymous voice asking “Do you own guns and if so, how many?” is going to generate a flood of truthful answers.
Weird. No one called me.
I think they are setting it up so they can claim voter fraud when PDJT breezes thru on election night.
You were right the first time.
Right. These suppression polls motivate me to work harder and donate more.
And I agree with the Freeper who said that conservatives avoid talking with pollsters. I can still hear the plaintive voice of one pollster when I told her I wasn't interested: "But I'm not selling anything," she whined.
That’s impossible, because Hillary already beat Trump with her 95% chance to win back in 2016.
PDJT was on Brian Kilmeade’s radio show this morning and declared that they “have very strong polls in house!”
IMO, all of these outlandish polls are meant to discourage us deplorables, no more, no less!
Make up the loss with black men and moderate Democrat men, like this one (It's a stunning speech from a Dem.)
Stop reading right there....
The truth is, Hillary Clinton was probably the worst Democratic candidate in history, for reasons about which most here would agree. To do worse than Hillary, the dems would have had to run Freddie Kreuger for president and Michael Myers for Vice. (As they're the party of abortion absolutists, they might be tempted to do this.) Even Hillary was able to win the popular vote, and she lost only because she ran a terrible campaign and forgot about the electoral college. Trump's victory was made possible by a few tens of thousands of votes in three or four unexpected takeaway states that cracked the "blue wall."
The Democrats are hyper energized by sheer hate. That may backfire once voters realize that the hate is now unhinged, and its targets extend far beyond Donald Trump. But that's a heckuva thing for us to be counting on.
Look into their methodology data, and you will find that:
A) The poll is of registered voters, not even likely voters.
B) They claim the sample had 34% Dems and 29% Republicans, then elsewhere reveal that 648 out of 1422 were “Democrat or Democrat-leaning.” (Nothing tells about “Repubican-leaning” voters). In effect you are looking at a poll weighted 45.5% Dem to 29% Republican.
The news story here is how bad the results are for the Dems given a 16.5% advantage.
So may lies, so little time....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.