Kalamata:
"Show us some of that evidence.
Make certain it is observable scientific evidence.
No story-telling, please.
If one must believe evolution to be true to see the evidence, then it is not evidence, but conjecture based on faith." Total lies.
You can observe evidence at any museum of natural history in pretty much any major city -- that's evidence you can see, touch, even smell.
Evolution hypothesis/theory is an explanation of the evidence, a scientific narrative (aka "story") which ties together the known facts and predicts what is not yet known.
Since Darwin's time the evidence supporting evolution theory has grown exponentially but has not ever falsified his basic ideas.
Kalamata: "You don’t understand the math.
It doesn’t matter what happened in between.
The calculation is from time1 to time2."
Of course I understand, you're using the wrong calculation, and it gives you a false picture of population growth, that's all.
Kalamata: "You obviously don’t understand the meaning of the words “scientific evidence”.
I’ll make it easy on you.
Show us evidence for the cornerstone of Darwinism, which is “common descent.”
The evidence must be observable whether we believe evolution to be true, or not.
Fair enough?"
You'll observe some of that evidence (fossils) in any museum of natural history.
DNA evidence requires you read a book or two -- you might start with Graur's.
Kalamata: "You may think I am lying, but it is only because you are scientifically-challenged."
Says Danny I-don't-see-no-stinkin'-evidence Kalamata. ![]()
>>Joe the Denier says, "Total lies. You can observe evidence at any museum of natural history in pretty much any major city -- that's evidence you can see, touch, even smell. Evolution hypothesis/theory is an explanation of the evidence, a scientific narrative (aka "story") which ties together the known facts and predicts what is not yet known.
You are confounding imaginative mockups based on fragmentary fossils with observable scientific evidence. That is a no, no.
*******************
>>Joe the Denier says, "Since Darwin's time the evidence supporting evolution theory has grown exponentially but has not ever falsified his basic ideas.
There is not a shred of observable scientific evidence for evolutionism. It is a myth,
*******************
>>Joe the Denier says, "Of course I understand, you're using the wrong calculation, and it gives you a false picture of population growth, that's all.
The evolutionism model is fake, since there is no data before the flood; but it does reveal the population flattens out before 3,000 BC, which is about the time of the flood.
*******************
>>Joe the Denier says, "You'll observe some of that evidence (fossils) in any museum of natural history. DNA evidence requires you read a book or two -- you might start with Graur's.
Evidence of common descent doesn't exist in the fossil record -- certainly not in any of the many paleontological books in my library. The fossils show the opposite of common descent.
Michael Behe's research reveals there is no common descent to the found in the DNA. Animals cannot evolve past the genetic boundary at the family level; and below that it is no genetic change, or devolution.
Mr. Kalamata