Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: monkeyshine

It’s a legalease nuance and does make a difference.

dems thought there was a gotcha and have been promoting it but it has now been walked back


1,393 posted on 07/24/2019 10:26:16 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1385 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick

Doesn’t look like he walked it back to me. He just corrected the misstatement that he “did not indict” the president. He obviously doesn’t have the power to indict, only to decide if there was an indictable crime. So he is standing by his actual point, which is that he opted not to decide only because of the OLC guideline that a sitting president can’t be indicted. What’s interesting is this still directly contradicts Barr’s statement about what Mueller told him on this point. According to Barr, Mueller repeatedly said the OLC guideline was *not* the only reason he didn’t decide on obstruction.


1,463 posted on 07/24/2019 10:48:47 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1393 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

It is of no practical difference. If I understand it he first said “The OLC would not let us indict him” and now he says “We did not really think about indicting him because of the OLC”.


1,517 posted on 07/24/2019 11:08:25 AM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1393 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson