In short, Lieu asked if DJT would have been indicted if not for the OLC opinion on POTUS not being able to be indicted. He answered Yes. This contradicted his own office’s May 29th memo. He just recanted his answer to Lieu.
recanted meaning?????
Libs on Twitter are having the exact opposite reaction to what we are all seeing..they are all convinced Trump has been “proven” to have obstructed justice based on Mueller’s testimony this AM and are jumping for joy about today’s theatrics..
Let’s not let ourselves get into an echo chamber..both sides are going to see what they want to see - as a total victory for “their” side.
(That said, I think this whole circus is complete and total horseshi$$..you can’t “obstruct justice” on a crime that never happened, for God’s sake)..
That won’t stop the Media from using the un-recanted version endlessly to fool their fellow Leftist Fools.
Ah, I know you said "in short" but I am not 100% sure that was the question Lieu asked (or the answer). But if you are right then I see why that makes the recanting a bigger deal. Thanks for the reply.
bkmk