Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: semimojo

“Right. Because we all know the cost of componant parts never affects the cost of the end consumer good.”

I’m guessing you didn’t read the whole article. The tariffs are placed on the first sale not the last and they are spread out so much that the hit to the consumer is minimal and in a good economy, can be absorbed easily.

Plus if they are sourced outside of China no one gets hurt at all, except for China.

Team Trump is cutting the legs out from China’s manufacturers, just like he did with Mexico and China sourced items. Canada will be next.


5 posted on 09/25/2018 9:49:38 AM PDT by MaxistheBest (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: MaxistheBest

It is a good article, with a dumb headline. Odds are it will cost the consumer a nickel here and a nickel there. But who cares, it is worth it to get control of the China problem.


7 posted on 09/25/2018 9:53:55 AM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: MaxistheBest
The tariffs are placed on the first sale not the last and they are spread out so much that the hit to the consumer is minimal and in a good economy, can be absorbed easily.

Which is it? Do they affect the consumer cost or not?

Don't forget, the claim is they won't cost a nickle.

9 posted on 09/25/2018 9:57:41 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: MaxistheBest

Hurt? Paying $32.50 instead of $29.00 for a toaster is not ‘hurt’. Hurt is watching your home town go into ruin because Hamilton-Beach closed down production and moved to China.


10 posted on 09/25/2018 10:00:14 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson