You post a long-winded lecture and embed something resembling a question somewhere in to bowels of your post. I skip those. If you need an answer, post a clear question.
Rather, I hardly think I was a long-winded nor that what i requested lack perspicuity or that you lack comprehension. Rather anything you might call an answer is what lacks clarity. Either answer the questions and answer fully and clearly or make it more obvious to us that you are avoiding them:
[annalex]: the Holy Scripture is itself the product of the Catholic Church.
Meaning, I assume, that that an assuredly (if conditionally) infallible magisterium is essential for determination [of] writings and men [as] being of God;
And that being the historical instruments and stewards of Divine revelation (oral and written) means that it is that assuredly infallible magisterium. Thus any who knowingly dissent from the latter must be in rebellion to God?
Or how else does the logic work that "we gave you the Scriptures, and therefore alone are the sure unreprovable standard on what it means/are a law unto ourselves?"