Posted on 05/03/2018 11:04:21 AM PDT by Simon Green
Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell (Calif.) wrote an op-ed for USA Today calling for the government to ban and confiscate assault weapons across the United States.
In the article published Thursday, Swalwell argues that a measure similar to the 1994 federal assault weapons ban is not enough to combat gun violence, because it would only prevent new sales of assault weapons. He suggests the government should institute a buy-back program, which would take existing assault weapons out of possession. The congressman also advocates the prosecution of any individual who decides to keep their firearm.
"Reinstating the federal assault weapons ban that was in effect from 1994 to 2004 would prohibit manufacture and sales, but it would not affect weapons already possessed," Swalwell writes. "This would leave millions of assault weapons in our communities for decades to come."
"Instead," he continues, "we should ban possession of military-style semiautomatic assault weapons, we should buy back such weapons from all who choose to abide by the law, and we should criminally prosecute any who choose to defy it by keeping their weapons."
Swalwell notes that law enforcement officials and shooting clubs would be exempt.
Throughout his op-ed, Swalwell never defines what he considers a "military-style semiautomatic assault weapon." Instead, he classifies an assault weapon as a firearm that is capable of "spraying a crowd" with "lethal fire in seconds."
"An assault weapon, then, is a hand-held weapon of war, capable of spraying a crowd with more lethal fire in seconds," Swalwell writes.
"Assault weapon" is a political term that often refers to semi-automatic firearms with specific features and accessories.
Swalwell also discusses the February shooting at a high school in Parkland, Florida, admitting that he has used "moral equivalence" arguments regarding the Second Amendment.
"There's something new and different about the surviving Parkland high schoolers' demands," he writes. "They dismiss the moral equivalence we've made for far too long regarding the Second Amendment. I've been guilty of it myself, telling constituents and reporters that ‘we can protect the Second Amendment and protect lives.'"
"The Parkland teens have taught us there is no right more important than every student's right to come home after class," Swalwell adds. "The right to live is supreme over any other."
Swalwell also touts Australia's gun buy-back program, noting his proposed U.S. program would be more expensive.
"Based on manufacturing figures and other indirect data, there could be 15 million assault weapons out there," he says. "If we offer $200 to buy back each weapon—as many local governments have—then it would cost about $3 billion; at $1,000 each, the cost would be about $15 billion."
Swalwell says the price tag pales in comparison to the Republican tax reform law.
So say eric swawell (D-fourth reich) that the government cannot trust citizens with firearms.
This. Coming from a state that wants to completely disarm its citizens while allowing illegal aliens from mexico/central america to rampage throughout their state with impunity.
They have no idea what they’re asking for the law of unintended consequences will be most unkind.
My answer is F and U. Let’s get CWII rolling already.
They’re all yours General Gage...
There aren't enough of you to ever enforce such a ban and I don't think there are very many Americans who would pick up a shovel to put you in the ground
Thanks Simon Green.
Wasp spray. I’m doomed.
He can have my ammo.. one round at a time.. in the face.
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. When you give up that force, you are ruined."
— Patrick Henry
"If someone is so fearful that they are going to start using their weapons to protect their rights, it makes me very nervous that these people have weapons at all."
— Rep. Henry Waxman
I don't know or heard of any such group. "want??"
Well, D'UH!
When all non-violent, civilized, rational alternatives have been exhausted and proven ineffectual...
"When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary to..."
Criminal elected national leaders are not born; the are deliberately and consciously self-made.
e.g. Hillary Rodham.
We all thought Pete Stark was a nut case.. h
His replacement, Swalwell, fills his old boots to the brim.. and then some.. in human excrement.
Finally, a law against all koranimals!
Weapon... check.
Fire... check.
"Fire" arm?... check.
Spraying crowd with lethal fire in seconds? Check.
Suicide vests qualify, I am sure.
How about a rotating barrel/firing attachment for a battery-operated hand drill? :-)
Dream on. There are over 5 million AR-15s in circulation not even counting all the other semiautomatic rifles out there. The AR-15 is THE most popular rifle in America. Any notions of banning it now are a pipe dream.
Just another Dem Ken Doll, getting elected simply on looks. And boy, they could have chosen better on looks anyway. Reminds me of ‘Beto’ O’Roarke, the guy running for Ted Cruz Senate seat.....not too bright but just another Dem Ken Doll. I think that’s the only thing that matters to those choosing the runners on the other side, as the Pennsylvania Ken Doll narrowly won a few months ago.
Where does he expect to jail 100 million resistors?
I like the way you think.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.