.
>> “Rosenstein should say unequivocally that Mueller is finding evidence of collusion with Russians” <<
Rosenstein never said he was looking for collusion evidence in the first place!
He knows that collusion is normal and legal unless it is in a contract bidding scheme.
.
Let’s not mince words. Collusion can be discarded and ‘interference’ can replace it.
Who gave the ‘mission’ to Mueller to focus on Russian interference in the 2016 election?
Whoever/whatever defined the scope for Mueller needs to review his progress. So far he’s a got a couple of shaky indictments related to Ukraine, not Russia. As Mueller and is poorly chosen staff burn through money, he has to be held to account.
Rosenstein appointed Mueller. Rosenstein must answer to Mueller’s performance. This is SOP in government operations.
Rosenstein must answer to Mueller’s efforts on finding Russian interference in the 2016 election. All he has to do is to issue a statement “ Mr. Mueller is finding evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election”. But he can’t do that because it’s not true.