To: heterosupremacist
I wonder if it is unlawful for the pharmacist to divulge this bit if information...
9 posted on
10/11/2017 2:30:14 PM PDT by
Clutch Martin
(Hot sauce aside, every culture has its pancakes, just as every culture has its noodle.)
To: Clutch Martin
#9 Clutch Martin wrote ~~~
Yes. HIPAA Act.
11 posted on
10/11/2017 2:33:48 PM PDT by
heterosupremacist
(Domine Iesu Christe, Filius Dei, miserere me peccatorem!)
To: Clutch Martin
This guy is going to see his business dry up I’d venture.
HIPPA frowns on this sort of thing.
16 posted on
10/11/2017 2:44:44 PM PDT by
SE Mom
(Screaming Eagle mom)
To: Clutch Martin
I wonder what other interesting ‘conditions’ our ‘representatives’ have.
24 posted on
10/11/2017 2:56:15 PM PDT by
jimbug
To: Clutch Martin
He’s not naming names. It’s legal.
To: Clutch Martin
I was thinking the same, in a broader aspect why would he answer any questions at all?. There may not be a total privilege here but talking to the press about his high profile clients will not do any good. The Doctors can easily use someplace else and cut him off.
To: Clutch Martin
“I wonder if it is unlawful for the pharmacist to divulge this bit if information...”
If no names are given I don’t think it violates HIPAA. And I’m hoping someone can hack in to this pharmacy’s data.
71 posted on
10/11/2017 4:22:15 PM PDT by
MayflowerMadam
(A person's greatest strength is his greatest weakness.)
To: Clutch Martin
There are 535 members of Congress. He didn't divulge names. However, his quotes indicate he is none too pleased that the lawmakers have such dire health issues. Consider him a brave man for bringing the info to light.
Interesting that this story broke immediately after DiFi announced her plan to run for re-election.
73 posted on
10/11/2017 4:26:50 PM PDT by
NautiNurse
(Tear down the Mexican Carrier plant and use the materials to build the wall)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson