As to being “chicken s****”...I’m in Seuol now. From what I observe, that doesn’t seem to be the case.
So if that's the case, why are the South Koreans more than likely going to elect a new president who is not for dealing effectively with NK. Like someone said the other day ( I think it was Bolton) “if after 25 years of appeasement, he doubts that the 26th year of the same course will yield the results that are needed." I understand that no one wants to go to war, but it's clear to me at least that failing to deal with this lunatic Un is likely to get some of us killed unless we preemptively strike him. I guess the big problem to be solved is preventing him from attacking Seoul when we hit his nuclear and missile sites. This whole thing goes clear back to MacArthur and Truman and not “fixing” the Chinese back in 1950.