To: rktman
“Americans have the right to civil disobedience...”
That is not all all accurate.
When one commits civil disobedience, they will be arrested.
If a person is arrested for an act, it usually means they had no right to commit that act.
Civil disobedience is breaking the law.
That’s not a right.
To: Timpanagos1
Civil disobedience is breaking the law.
That’s not a right.
Correct.
10 posted on
02/14/2017 10:31:26 AM PST by
marktwain
(We wanted to tell our side of the story. We hope by us telling our story...)
To: Timpanagos1
Civil disobedience is breaking the law.
That’s not a right.
I don't know, I read somewhere that it was...
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
13 posted on
02/14/2017 10:39:57 AM PST by
Garth Tater
(What's mine is mine.)
To: Timpanagos1; marktwain
Civil disobedience is breaking the law. That’s not a right. The Left presumes that they can break the law with impunity. In many Democrat-controlled areas, they are correct. The police will be told by Dem politicians to "stand down" as far as doing anything about violence by Leftists.
43 posted on
02/14/2017 11:21:25 AM PST by
PapaBear3625
(Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
To: Timpanagos1
What’s the difference between civil disobedience and free speech? The line between the two is getting fuzzy when you listen to the liberals.
63 posted on
02/14/2017 11:59:05 AM PST by
353FMG
(AMERICA FIRST.)
To: Timpanagos1
Civil disobedience is breaking the law. That’s not a right.
right you are, King George the Third...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson