Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump EPA Secretary Will Have ‘16,000 Employees Working Against Him’
Daily Caller ^ | 11:55 PM 01/28/2017 | Photo of Christopher Bedford CHRISTOPHER BEDFORD

Posted on 01/29/2017 9:59:13 AM PST by drewh

PALM SPRINGS, CALIF. — When likely EPA Secretary Scott Pruitt walks into his first day at the office, “He’ll have 16,000 employees working against him,” Sen. James Lankford told a large gathering of libertarian donors Saturday evening.

“And I expect a flood of lawsuits over everything he does.”

Pruitt, who has been nominated to lead the EPA by President Donald Trump, is the attorney general of Lankford’s state, Oklahoma. He has faced fierce opposition from the environmentalist left.

Lankford, who chairs the Senate Oversight Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care and Entitlements, was joined on stage by Sens. Mike Lee and Pat Toomey. Their panel, moderated by Americans for Prosperity President Tim Phillips, was during a dinner on day one of Charles and David Koch’s libertarian Seminar Network in Palm Springs, Calif. (RELATED: Mike Lee Is Certain The Senate Will Confirm Trump’s Supreme Court Nominee)

Sponsored Content Psoriatic Arthritis Symptoms: What You Should Know Psoriatic Arthritis Symptoms: What You Should Know Yahoo Search Rare Images Of The Old West That Will Make Your Skin Crawl Rare Images Of The Old West That Will Make Your Skin Crawl Reinventing Aging Meet America's Newest "Mary Jane Millionaires" Meet America's Newest "Mary Jane Millionaires" Status Sponsored Links by Held twice a year, the seminars are a gathering place for the Seminar Network, a large group of wealthy donors interested in libertarian causes. This weekend’s seminar, held in the temperate desert outside of Los Angeles, will be the first since Trump’s election and inauguration. The network spent hundreds of millions on advertising and advocacy for limited-government politicians — namely, Republicans — running for the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives, but notably stayed out of the presidential primaries and race. The network is co-chaired by Charles Koch Institute President Brian Hooks and Mark Holden, general counsel for Koch Industries. (RELATED: As Trump Presidency Dawns, Kochs Plan To Bring Hundreds Of Millions To Bear On Next Two Years)

Of the three senators, Lankford was the only tepid backer of Trump, saying he would support the nominee and frequently dodging press requests to weigh in on specific incidents. Toomey withheld endorsement of Trump, though didn’t rule it out, and was a frequent critic. On Election Day, he said he was voting for Trump. Lee, who is a close friend of Sen. Ted Cruz and represents Utah’s quieter, more conflict-adverse Mormon Republican electorate, urged Trump to quit in October and declined to endorse him throughout the election. (RELATED: Three Republican Senators Kick Off Koch’s First Massive Donor Conference In Age Of Trump)

Called “A Time to Lead,” the meeting is hosted at the Renaissance Indian Wells Resort and Spa, and is focused on local, grassroots initiatives Americans can take in what Hooks called “the key institutions of society”– “education, community, business and government.” (RELATED: Charles Koch Calls For Action: ‘We Might Not Have An Opportunity Again Like We Have Today’)

There are around 550 individuals included in the “principals” network meeting, which requires at least $100,000 donation to the network. In addition to these invited people, there are approximately 150 staff and speakers, Seminar Network spokesman James David told reporters. There is also a larger press presence than any previous conference has allowed.

Follow Bedford on Twitter

Editor’s Note: Christopher Bedford was a fellow at the Charles Koch Institute in 2010.

Tags: Charles Koch, Charles Koch Institute, Environmental Protection Agency, James Lankford, Mike Lee, Pat Toomey, Scott Pruitt Show comments


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: epa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: drewh

So what is wrong with eliminating the agency, then?

Within 10 days of Trump’s presidency, we will have down one gubmint agency.

Go Trump.


21 posted on 01/29/2017 10:09:47 AM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = USSR; Journ0List + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh
Dear EPA employees,

Sen. James Lankford just cut your throats. He declared war against Trump and you will pay the price. I would be really pissed off if I was one of you.

22 posted on 01/29/2017 10:10:13 AM PST by IC Ken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Have them sign no leak loyalty pledges.


23 posted on 01/29/2017 10:10:24 AM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Do away with the EPA, and give the responsibility to the states or fire the mutts. Those bastards have been screwing the USA for years, time to go.


24 posted on 01/29/2017 10:10:56 AM PST by kenmcg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

I want the House and Senate to pass legislation putting a two year moratorium on all civil service rules affecting or related to firing and laying off any federal civil servant; allowing the newly appointed federal department and agency heads to not need to show any cause other than the decision of the executive official in charge.


25 posted on 01/29/2017 10:11:07 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

16,000 new job openings for conservatives. I don’t see the problem.


26 posted on 01/29/2017 10:15:24 AM PST by blackbetty59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative
And if he can't fire them, just lower there pay to $1.00 per year. Even at that rate they will be overpaid.
27 posted on 01/29/2017 10:16:23 AM PST by EXCH54FE (Hurricane 416,Feisty Old Vet !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Fire them


28 posted on 01/29/2017 10:16:36 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kenmcg

I am with you. What do we need the EPA for anyway? Do they add value? Do they build something people cannot “live without”? No they do not, they subtract from our freedoms as people. Without the EPA everything in America went along just fine. NON-ESSENTIAL PERSONNEL that is what every one of them is.


29 posted on 01/29/2017 10:17:07 AM PST by Glad2bnuts (If Republicans are not prepared to carry on the Revolution of 1776, prepare for a communist takeover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

That could work, but so could a corporate tactic. Move their offices right next to the southern wall project. Anyone that does not care to move no longer has a job, and the union can pound salt as it is their choice.


30 posted on 01/29/2017 10:17:17 AM PST by jdsteel (Give me freedom, not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: drewh

He has to remember he will have 60+ million puling for him to drain that place too


31 posted on 01/29/2017 10:24:16 AM PST by pangaea6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Sounds like 16,000 people need to be let go.


32 posted on 01/29/2017 10:25:41 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

President Trump has already put a freeze on new hires.
Why can’t he also freeze transfers between Departments and announce a downsizing of each Department and just lay off those whose jobs are sent to the states or eliminated entirely.
It works in the private sector, why not with public employees?


33 posted on 01/29/2017 10:26:09 AM PST by oldvirginian (If someone tells you biscuits and gravy ain't a meal, just walk away. You don't need the negativity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jay W

Remember what Regan did to PATCO?


34 posted on 01/29/2017 10:31:44 AM PST by Keyhopper (Indians had bad immigration laws)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

A savvy leadership directive would be to fix it, or kill it. And let it be known with the first issued memorandum from the boss.


35 posted on 01/29/2017 10:52:24 AM PST by Clutch Martin (Hot sauce aside, every culture has its pancake, just as every culture has its egg roll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: All

Send any recalcitrant ones who can’t actually be fired to clean up, with buckets and simple sand filters, the Animas River which the EPA intentionally fouled.

But don’t send them to the beautiful parts of the River in Colorado... Send them to clean it in the rather dreary areas between Aztec and Farmington, NM.

No per-diem for motels and restaurants. Set up a tent camp.


36 posted on 01/29/2017 10:55:45 AM PST by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IC Ken
Sen. James Lankford just [...] declared war against Trump

Where did he do that? Making a prediction is not "declaring war." Regardless of Lankford's lukewarm position on Trump during the primaries, his forecast is certainly correct.

37 posted on 01/29/2017 10:58:17 AM PST by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come 'round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: drewh
How to cause Federal Employees in Washington, D.C. or any major city to self-terminate, resign:

Build or lease a new office building in rural Missouri, Oklahoma, North Dakota or Montana (i.e. undesirable place for those type of people). Get it ready with equipment and everything needed to get the job done. Tell them their present building is to be vacated and used/sold for another purpose.

Then, tell them they must move to the new location or resign. With children, grandchildren, family, friends, real estate investments and their homes where they are living now, a large percentage will resign. That leaves a much smaller group with which to work with to change attitudes.

38 posted on 01/29/2017 11:02:35 AM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
Re>Where did he do that?

He said all 16,000 would be working against Trump. Now once again, If I was one of those employees I would be mad at such a statement. Wait to see how this works out.

39 posted on 01/29/2017 11:07:08 AM PST by IC Ken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: drewh
It is always thus with Republican Presidents, even if they agree with the staff in on somethinr Lenin put itclearly about what is themost important with his little book titled WHO? Whom? The most basic consideration, even before policies and attitudes is Who rules and over Whom? Two totalist parties espousing the same doctrines will attack each other more violently than either attacks its ideological foes. Who? Whom?
40 posted on 01/29/2017 11:13:55 AM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson