[Resettozero]

Schumer-backed plan?

Let’s read it before we pass it.

[RetiredArmy]

Right. Remember the LAST bill they passed, and were to pass it so they got the opportunity to read it, called it obammycare. GOD!!!! Ain’t it great to wake up every morning and know that slime ball is not in our White House!!!!! Oh, how fantastic!!!!

[9YearLurker]

No, let’s just not pass it.

Here’s a case where I hope the GOP congress critters have some backbone.

[RideForever]

We can cut the funding requirements by half if we drop the Mexifornia projects of high speed train to nowhere and another peripheral canal waterway to suck the water down from NorCal to SoCal. Since Mexifornia is a sanctuary state, no need to waste federal money there.

[Ancesthntr]

“Schumer-backed plan?

Let’s read it before we pass it.”

---

You clearly don’t know Schumer very well. The only proper response is to snidely reject it out-of-hand as another means of corruptly paying off Dem toadies and not doing anything of substance, and to then come up with a plan of your own. Something tells me that this is just about what Trump will do (maybe not so snidely as I would, but then again I don’t have to govern or get my nominees approved).

[wastedyears]

The democrat way is to pass it before you can see what’s in it.

[Gamecock]

Oh come on, we all know we have to read it afterwards.

[Sam Gamgee]

Indeed. Especially concerned about all the rail investment. Civilian railways lose money.