Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Democrats Introduce $1 Trillion Infrastructure Plan, Offer Trump Support If He Backs It
Zero Hedge ^ | 01/24/2017

Posted on 01/24/2017 6:30:17 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Senate Democrats are set to unveil a $1 trillion infrastructure plan and offer President Donald Trump their support if he backs it, the NYT reports.

The plan includes $180 billion to rail and bus systems, $65 billion to ports, airports and waterways, $110 billion for water and sewer systems, $100  billion for energy infrastructure, and $20 billion for public and tribal lands.

Cited by the Times, Chuck Schumer said “our urban and rural communities have their own unique set of infrastructure priorities, and this proposal would provide funding to address those needed upgrades that go beyond the traditional road and bridge repair." The Senate Democrat leader adds that “We’re asking President Trump to work with us to make it a reality/"

As part of his agenda, Trump has promised to unveil an ambitious infrastructure package during the first 100 days of his presidency. “We will build new roads, and highways, and bridges, and airports, and tunnels, and railways all across our wonderful nation,” he vowed in his Inaugural Address.

One of Trump’s top advisers said Monday, however, that the president’s plan may run into roadblocks in the Republican-led Congress.

“He has to come up with a financing plan, and I think there’s going to be a little bit of a tug of war between the conservatives in the Republican party who are concerned about deficits and the president who’s concerned about jobs,” Richard LeFrak said on CNBC’s "Squawk Box." “I think he will prevail, ultimately, because he wants to put people to work.”

Republicans resisted President Barack Obama’s push for an infrastructure “surge” for eight years, arguing that the federal government couldn’t afford it and that state and local governments should shoulder more responsibility for improvements. However, now that Trump "has taken up the Democratic cause", they may find it more problematic.

Meanwhile, as the NYT adds, the first major test of Mr. Trump and his sway over congressional Republicans will come Tuesday morning at 10 a.m. That is when the Congressional Budget Office, the nonpartisan Capitol Hill scorekeeper, will update its budget outlook. The office is expected to say that the federal deficit, after years of decline, will start swelling again this year and will pick up steam over the next decade if policies aren’t changed to curb the growth of health care programs and of Social Security in an aging populace.

The annual report could be a major brake on Mr. Trump’s agenda, which includes large increases in spending on infrastructure and defense, as well as deep tax cuts. Those plans could collide with Republican promises to balance the budget — if Republicans care about such niceties in the Trump era.

As we noted previously, according to a Barclays analysis, infrastructure spending in the US will take a long time to ramp up. The bank laid out the top 10 projects currently in planning or construction, and just these along will take as much as 1-2 years before any practical benefits "trickle down" to the long-ignored US steel sector which Trump has vowed to revitalize. This is what Barclays said last week:

Given the unknowns about Trump’s infrastructure plan – lack of clarity on total spend, past ineffectiveness of stimulus efforts, timing of implementation, pushback from Congress – we currently model no additional metals demand from supplemental infrastructure investment during 2017-18 into our baseline forecast. As greater visibility becomes available, we will adjust our consumption forecasts to take into account the latest spending plans. The key issue we think is facing the metals sector is that even if infrastructure spending is approved at the headline level ($1trn over 10 years, or $100bn a year) and implementation is effective, the project schedule does not allow for an immediate effect on metals consumption, particularly over the next two to three years.

A list of the ten largest US infra projects is shown below:



TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: congress; democrats; first100days; infrastructure; republicans; senate; trump; trump45
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last
To: TheShaz

For all we know, and this would not be unlike the Donald, he may have TOLD Chuckie, draw up a bill with what you’d want in an infrastructure bill, and we’ll work from there.


61 posted on 01/24/2017 7:15:10 AM PST by ichabod1 (Make America Normal Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

Of course they will. This gives them a slightly firmer foundation to scream. Their base will eat it up. I can just hear one of my wife’s lib kook friends picking up the chorus —”Trump lied about infrastructure! IMPEACH!”


62 posted on 01/24/2017 7:16:41 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If it is a democrat plan then you can bet that about $100 B might go to infrastructure while the other $900 B will all be pork.


63 posted on 01/24/2017 7:20:29 AM PST by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Screw that. Why should people in Fargo pay for subways in NY or bridges in San Francisco? I opposed it when 0bama wanted to do it, when Bill Clinton wanted it...and when Trump wants it.


64 posted on 01/24/2017 7:21:37 AM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If it passes, someone had better keep a sharp eye and a tight grip on the money to see that it actually goes where it’s intended, or it will be another shovel ready Obloviate boondoggle.


65 posted on 01/24/2017 7:22:20 AM PST by Tucker39 (In giving us The Christ, God gave us the ONE thing we desperately NEEDED; a Savior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Most of the spending in areas that are virulent anti-trump


66 posted on 01/24/2017 7:25:32 AM PST by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

67 posted on 01/24/2017 7:26:26 AM PST by Lazamataz (TRUMP LIED TO ME!!!! ....He said I'd get sick of winning.... AND I'M NOT SICK OF WINNING YET!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
An infrastructure plan is surely and sorely needed, but it MUST come from the Trump Administration.

Trust the dhimmicrats not one inch !

It's a shamelessly blatant attempt to steal DJ's thunder on this issue, one with which they were unconcerned prior to Trump's including it in his platform.

68 posted on 01/24/2017 7:31:01 AM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I don’t think that’s the kind of infrastructure Trump was thinking about.

Those are pork barrel projects designed to benefit people ion the cities.

I think what he was talking about was infrastructure across America where every day people live and work.


69 posted on 01/24/2017 7:32:04 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Never trust a democrat. Never. They cooperate first.


70 posted on 01/24/2017 7:35:14 AM PST by No Socialist (Patty Squier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Joke.


71 posted on 01/24/2017 7:36:33 AM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

NEW PROJECTS is not what I consider to be infrastructure spending.

Infrastructure spending is repairing/renovating the old but still usable.

Every state should submit a prioritized list that is prioritized in terms of greatest economic return, and from that list those projects providing the greatest national economic return should be chosen. I’d probably acknowledge that each state should have some participation via some project. Like with the electoral college...smaller states need some protection.


72 posted on 01/24/2017 7:48:13 AM PST by xzins (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots
Tell democrats they cannot be trusted.

EXAMPLE: This is their non-bi-partisan list. How about some proof of democrat good-willed bi-partisanship?

73 posted on 01/24/2017 7:48:48 AM PST by Rapscallion ( Equal justice is an American principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: apillar

Trump has taken a huge bite out of the democrat union voters. You would have him flush it down the drain? The next four years are crucial to our cause. The tent must be made as large as possible. Unions are in the middle of an epiphany and will soon start replacing liberal union leaders. Don’t blow that please.


74 posted on 01/24/2017 7:52:48 AM PST by enduserindy (I always smile when my competition doubles down on stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

“Schumer-backed plan?

Let’s read it before we pass it.”


You clearly don’t know Schumer very well. The only proper response is to snidely reject it out-of-hand as another means of corruptly paying off Dem toadies and not doing anything of substance, and to then come up with a plan of your own. Something tells me that this is just about what Trump will do (maybe not so snidely as I would, but then again I don’t have to govern or get my nominees approved).


75 posted on 01/24/2017 7:55:09 AM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

At first glance, less than half of it is infrastructure, and much of that is the light rail boondoggles.


76 posted on 01/24/2017 7:56:43 AM PST by Ingtar (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

The democrat way is to pass it before you can see what’s in it.


77 posted on 01/24/2017 7:56:47 AM PST by wastedyears (President of the United States Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why don’t the ‘Rats just ask Trump to change parties and become ‘Rat?

That is the equivalent of buying into this ‘Rat plan.


78 posted on 01/24/2017 7:57:26 AM PST by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1

That’s funny i69 construction between Indianapolis and Evansville is going to be completed in a year I think.


79 posted on 01/24/2017 7:58:52 AM PST by enduserindy (I always smile when my competition doubles down on stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
They have to know it’s DOA... why would they waste their time?

So they can say they're trying to reach out to him, but when he vetoes it, media-hogs Graham, McCain and Schumer can do what they love (which isn't representing the interests of their respective states) which is go in front of the media, and say that Trump doesn't care about the infrastructure of the country.

I really, really hope he understands the game they're playing. Not to insinuate he doesn't know the gamesmanship, but he has to say no at every juncture.

80 posted on 01/24/2017 7:59:37 AM PST by wastedyears (President of the United States Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson