Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Democrats Introduce $1 Trillion Infrastructure Plan, Offer Trump Support If He Backs It
Zero Hedge ^ | 01/24/2017

Posted on 01/24/2017 6:30:17 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Senate Democrats are set to unveil a $1 trillion infrastructure plan and offer President Donald Trump their support if he backs it, the NYT reports.

The plan includes $180 billion to rail and bus systems, $65 billion to ports, airports and waterways, $110 billion for water and sewer systems, $100  billion for energy infrastructure, and $20 billion for public and tribal lands.

Cited by the Times, Chuck Schumer said “our urban and rural communities have their own unique set of infrastructure priorities, and this proposal would provide funding to address those needed upgrades that go beyond the traditional road and bridge repair." The Senate Democrat leader adds that “We’re asking President Trump to work with us to make it a reality/"

As part of his agenda, Trump has promised to unveil an ambitious infrastructure package during the first 100 days of his presidency. “We will build new roads, and highways, and bridges, and airports, and tunnels, and railways all across our wonderful nation,” he vowed in his Inaugural Address.

One of Trump’s top advisers said Monday, however, that the president’s plan may run into roadblocks in the Republican-led Congress.

“He has to come up with a financing plan, and I think there’s going to be a little bit of a tug of war between the conservatives in the Republican party who are concerned about deficits and the president who’s concerned about jobs,” Richard LeFrak said on CNBC’s "Squawk Box." “I think he will prevail, ultimately, because he wants to put people to work.”

Republicans resisted President Barack Obama’s push for an infrastructure “surge” for eight years, arguing that the federal government couldn’t afford it and that state and local governments should shoulder more responsibility for improvements. However, now that Trump "has taken up the Democratic cause", they may find it more problematic.

Meanwhile, as the NYT adds, the first major test of Mr. Trump and his sway over congressional Republicans will come Tuesday morning at 10 a.m. That is when the Congressional Budget Office, the nonpartisan Capitol Hill scorekeeper, will update its budget outlook. The office is expected to say that the federal deficit, after years of decline, will start swelling again this year and will pick up steam over the next decade if policies aren’t changed to curb the growth of health care programs and of Social Security in an aging populace.

The annual report could be a major brake on Mr. Trump’s agenda, which includes large increases in spending on infrastructure and defense, as well as deep tax cuts. Those plans could collide with Republican promises to balance the budget — if Republicans care about such niceties in the Trump era.

As we noted previously, according to a Barclays analysis, infrastructure spending in the US will take a long time to ramp up. The bank laid out the top 10 projects currently in planning or construction, and just these along will take as much as 1-2 years before any practical benefits "trickle down" to the long-ignored US steel sector which Trump has vowed to revitalize. This is what Barclays said last week:

Given the unknowns about Trump’s infrastructure plan – lack of clarity on total spend, past ineffectiveness of stimulus efforts, timing of implementation, pushback from Congress – we currently model no additional metals demand from supplemental infrastructure investment during 2017-18 into our baseline forecast. As greater visibility becomes available, we will adjust our consumption forecasts to take into account the latest spending plans. The key issue we think is facing the metals sector is that even if infrastructure spending is approved at the headline level ($1trn over 10 years, or $100bn a year) and implementation is effective, the project schedule does not allow for an immediate effect on metals consumption, particularly over the next two to three years.

A list of the ten largest US infra projects is shown below:



TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: congress; democrats; first100days; infrastructure; republicans; senate; trump; trump45
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: SeekAndFind

The problem is the GOP Congress has been negligent for years. They’ve voted numerous times to eliminate O’care but as events in recent weeks have shown us, they had no plan to replace O’care or deal with the inevitable market repercussions of simply ending the program. It was easy to vote for repeal when they knew Obama would veto a repeal — just a meaningless political game to deceive the GOP voting base.

Likewise, they have no plan ready to go to rebuild infrastructure in the US. Their focus is on pork for their districts, not a visionary effort such as the Interstate Highway program or Transcontinental Railroad which will benefit the entire nation for decades. The GOP Congress quite simply doesn’t want to provide vision and govern. It is filled with political hacks who protect their home turf and curry favor with donors. The party has no vision and no principles.

The Democrats have a socialist vision for America and everything they do is calculated to achieve it. They know how to play the publicity game. Now that Trump is talking infrastructure, they are putting a real infrastructure bill on the table. Meanwhile the GOP leadership hasn’t even thought about drafting a bill for infrastructure, O’care replacement, or anything else. For them to draft a bill will take months. Meanwhile the Dems and media will pound away with the message — we have a bill ready to go, why is the GOP holding up job creation? Meanwhile they will stall Trumps executive branch nominations to keep the executive from formulating and presenting its own agenda.

The GOP has controlled the House for six years and the Senate for 2. What does it have to show in terms of legislation benefitting the people versus benefitting the donor base?

The leaders of the GOP Congress have no vision for the country. When you don’t know where you are going, any road will take you there.


41 posted on 01/24/2017 6:56:19 AM PST by Soul of the South
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Reminds me of the Dem hag (sorry, I cannot remember which Dem hag it was) that basically came out and said ‘we will work with Trump if he does what WE want’. Just a couple of weeks ago....wish I could remember who said it.


42 posted on 01/24/2017 6:56:28 AM PST by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Don’t bite on it, Mr. President.

Their plan will be another Obama Porkulus. The money will go to keep funding the Left and not for infrastructure.


43 posted on 01/24/2017 6:58:29 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

To all high speed rails...NO, Hell NO!!


44 posted on 01/24/2017 6:59:22 AM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

Request that Ditz Pelosi read it, first!


45 posted on 01/24/2017 7:01:45 AM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Stimulate demand for copper by building high speed rail.”

The government could stimulate copper demand by casting copper ingots and putting them in the parking lot. Those ingots would have as much value as the high speed choo-choo.


46 posted on 01/24/2017 7:02:16 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
They are asking for federal funding for the private Texas Central Railroad?

For $10 billion?

Not needed, not wanted by most Texans.

Southwest, AA and United all fly at 450 knots and can do the trip in 30 minutes.

47 posted on 01/24/2017 7:03:10 AM PST by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

So they can scream “He won’t work with us! He lied — he said he wanted to build infrastructure! LIAR! LIAR!”


48 posted on 01/24/2017 7:03:56 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Do your own plan and use bits and pieces of their plan to peel enough of them away if needed to pass the overall plan.


49 posted on 01/24/2017 7:04:08 AM PST by ichabod1 (Make America Normal Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Hey!! That is unfair. Pelosi said that unemployment payments benefit the economy 2- or 3-1, too! So THERE! :-)


50 posted on 01/24/2017 7:04:32 AM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Trump WILL HAVE someone going through these bills line by line, just like his business contracts, this man is a builder they won’t get ANYTHING past him!!!


51 posted on 01/24/2017 7:08:03 AM PST by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

I see Trump “Entertaining” the Dems on their Bill. There is no way that their bill passes Congress, let alone the President as is.

Bus & Train needs a serious cut. Roads & Bridges need a serious boost. Water & Sewage as well.

I expect Trump to pull something to ensure that the contracts for these get spread out and its not all going to Union outfits.

Wheelin’ & Dealin’ - This is what we expect Trump to be able to do. Yes the GOP has majorities in Congress but we will need to get some Democrats to cross over. We might not get all we want, and the Dems will not get all they want.


52 posted on 01/24/2017 7:08:19 AM PST by TheShaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

> Offers Trump Support If He Backs It

That’s like Lucy with the football.


53 posted on 01/24/2017 7:08:42 AM PST by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

It’s a Trap!


54 posted on 01/24/2017 7:10:04 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

They’re going to scream that anyway with or without a proposal of their own in hand.


55 posted on 01/24/2017 7:11:54 AM PST by thoughtomator (Purple: the color of sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

Wasn’t Joe Biden tasked with tracking the performance of the first stimulus? Trump should ask for the full report.


56 posted on 01/24/2017 7:12:44 AM PST by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: texas booster

I wish they would spend some money and actually build the I-69 between Houston and Texarkana instead of just leaving the signs up.


57 posted on 01/24/2017 7:12:55 AM PST by ichabod1 (Make America Normal Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: All

We can cut the funding requirements by half if we drop the Mexifornia projects of high speed train to nowhere and another peripheral canal waterway to suck the water down from NorCal to SoCal. Since Mexifornia is a sanctuary state, no need to waste federal money there.


58 posted on 01/24/2017 7:13:05 AM PST by RideForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Didn’t they already do this in 2009? They were so successful that they should be allowed to do it again? I don’t think so.


59 posted on 01/24/2017 7:13:16 AM PST by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Its a $1 Trillion gift to Dems biggest constituents - state and local government workers, teachers, and their pension funds.


60 posted on 01/24/2017 7:13:17 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson