Posted on 12/23/2016 7:18:48 AM PST by rktman
While liberals talk a lot about racism they ignore the far greater threat of their own Anti-Human Movement (AHM).
The AHM is a way to group and describe those people, the vast majority of modern liberals, who object not to this or to that race but to humanity in general. They’re the people who view other people as the problem. The Voluntary Human Extinction Movement -- which believes mankind should go away in order to help the planet -- is the extreme wing of the AHM.
While the AHM doesn’t have a secret handshake, regular meetings, monthly dues, or even a membership list, it does have an immense impact on modern politics. Because their thesis -- people are the problem -- is so odious, AHM members generally avoid explicitly stating their distaste for humanity.
However, we can see what they believe from occasional slips, the statements of the more extreme members, and the policies that they support.
To the AHM, people in general are a blight on the planet and civilization.
That’s why the AHM supports killing the unborn and denying medical treatment to the elderly. We often hear liberals talk about how federal funding of abortion would reduce the number of people on welfare, for example. AHM members don’t think that the problem with welfare is that it’s too easy to get or that we could reform welfare. Rather, they think that the problem is too many people, and their solution is to kill those people before they’re born.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Interesting.
>>I wouldn’t say that I ‘Hate’ Hannity, but he isn’t my favorite Fox news show.<<
That is how I read it, too! LOL
” First of all, the earth doesn’t “die”. The number of ways to truly destroy the earth number about 8 and the odds are staggeringly against it happening soon.”
And the earth couldn’t care less. An asteroid could smash into the earth and obliterate it and the earth would not complain.
There is only one species that I know of that cares about the planet’s well being, it’s humans. Yet these self loathing morons want to eradicate it.
It kind of reflects back to the fundamental mistakenness of the “hate humanity” push, or more precisely, the Satanic nature of it, the defiance of God’s will.
God’s will will be tested (how’s that for a double word, will will) but it will be found to prevail. Can’t keep a lid on heaven forever; can’t stop up Jesus’ grave forever. God is bound and determined to redeem what is possible to redeem (some will refuse) and it will be, like Emeril says, BAM!
In the natural sphere, probably only humans have the ability to give it any sort of sustained thought.
In the supernatural sphere, we have more actors with interest (or more) in the game.
Drop them off in a wilderness 50 miles from the nearest road and most of them won’t make it out.
It’s kind of like the mind-entrancing spell of the song “Dust In The Wind.” This song, not QUITE true (understatement of the year, since God is quite an inconvenience to its scenario) still has a way of getting us, in our fallen state, to just stare and go ohhhhhhhhh.....
What? No mention of "The Involuntary Human Extinction Movement", better known by its Arabic name 'islam'.
That’s how I read it...the first time.
The devil wouldn’t have any fun with that if it didn’t allow SOME room for population to regrow.
There is actually an organized movement for people who feel this way; it’s called the Deep Green Resistance. One of its leaders is a female named Lierre Keith. She is featured in a number of YouTube videos.
Just saw their “welcome” video on YouTube. Seems they want violent overthrow of western civilization, so long as its not them in the trenches. Did I get that wrong?
Just my opinion, not an attack of any sort as I am a live-and-let-live kinda guy, but I vote no on animal’s having souls.
My reasoning is that if animals had souls, God would not have told Adam that they were all placed on this earth for his use. I know that this is a very broad and generalized statement, but you get the gist, Adam was allowed to use the animals (responsibly) as food and as beasts of burden.
I am of the opinion that God would not subject a being with a celestial soul to being destined to be dinner or slave labor/indentured servitude.
Again, just my opinion, which is free, and worth every penny.
This brings up a belief of mine that most of humanity has become "domesticated". By domesticated, I mean incapable of surviving without outside assistance.
I am of the opinion that a very, very large portion of humanity would die off rather quickly if placed in a 1700-1800 type of society. Very few can make their own shelter, or start a fire, or grow their own food, or butcher their own meat, or treat wounds or illness.
Like a dog that would die without it's owners there to care for it, people, without the assistance of other people with specialized skills, would also succumb to harsh environments.
I believe that this is what is at the crux of the prepper movement. People are starting to wake up and want to become self-reliant.
I am woefully unprepared to take care of myself and mine, but I am working to change that.
The animals are incapable of some things, such as moral choice as we know it. A bad dog is a factor of its breeding and environment.
The term, nephesh, generally meaning soul, is used in the creation story with respect to a large segment of the animal kingdom. Tying it to breathing doesn’t quite work, because this term is also used of fish.
A slavery or servitude would be wrong if moral choice were possible of the animals. As it were, we are still bidden to regard our beasts’ lives (or as commonly rendered in bibles, be kind to them). But an eternally remaining part would be free of whatever that slavery or servitude was.
The answer is spiritually perpendicular to this. Look to Christ. Selfish prepping would not be in character; being willing to share to the last would be. An apocalypse might bring a rapid death that way, but it would also bring a better investment in heaven. However God has miraculous ways to provide as well. It might be that those who are depending on God and following along with His desire to share, will also find themselves more creatively thinking about resources, with minds not cluttered by a small set of conventional ideas. Again this is personally chosen sharing, nothing forced by a government.
"Western Civilization" has done a far better job at conserving natural resources than developing countries ever have, so why would "environmentalists" hate Western Civilization above all else? Do they really think that Zimbabwe or Guatemala do a better job protecting their resources and wildlife than the United States does?
This just goes to show that their real agenda isn't about conservation or "the envirnoment," it's really all about Cultural Marxism.
Thanks HiTech ... you have given me good material to meditate on over the Christmas weekend.
May His blessings be with you and yours.
I don’t hate Hannity. I am , however, continually exasperated by him. He stays wrong footed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.