...from inviting/identifying its way into this ALL Alphafem Glacier party?
Waiting for this bunch of losers to hook up with the bunch on “Continent 7” TV show also in search of climate change data.
Wow. The headline is right out of Pravda from the 1960s.
Discriminatory
Sexist
No diversity of ideas
...from inviting/identifying its way into this ALL Alphafem Glacier party?
“Well La-De-Da”
The following also apply:
BFD, Whoopty Fricken Do, Who Gives a Shiite, and Who F’n Cares.
This will be the largest collection of nipples panging up in one place in history.
What a waste of time given climate change is nothing but a money making globalist scam.
Bitter -now literally!
Feminist PhD Candidate: Science Is Sexist Because It’s Not Subjective
BYLINE: Women and minorities cannot understand logic or objective truths, says a graduate student in her dissertation, so science classes should stop using the scientific method.
By Joy Pullman. |. The Federalist
College science classes are hostile to women and minorities because they use the scientific method, which assumes people can find reliable truths about the natural world through careful and sustained experimentation, concludes a recent dissertation by a doctoral candidate at the University of North Dakota.
Laura Parson, a student in the university’s education department, reviewed eight science class syllabi at a “Midwest public university” and said she discovered in them a hidden hostility to women and minorities:
Initial exploration of the STEM syllabi in this study did not reveal overt references to gender, such as through the use of gendered pronouns. However, upon deeper review, language used in the syllabi reflects institutionalized STEM teaching practices and views about knowledge that are inherently discriminatory to women and minorities by promoting a view of knowledge as static and unchanging, a view of teaching that promotes the idea of a passive student, and by promoting a chilly climate that marginalizes women.
Even though the course syllabi contained no “gendered assumptions” about students or other overtly discriminatory implications, Parson writes, they display prejudice against women and minorities because they refuse to entertain the possibility that “scientific knowledge is subjective.”
Women Are Too Stupid to Use Logic
Throughout her dissertation, Parson assumes and asserts that women and minorities are uniquely challenged by the idea that science can provide objective information about the natural world. This is an unfair assumption, she says, because the concept of objectivity is too hard for women and minorities to understand. “[N]otions of absolute truth and a single reality” are “masculine,” she says, referring to poststructuralist feminist theory.
Instead of promoting the idea that knowledge is constructed by the student and dynamic, subject to change as it would in a more feminist view of knowledge, the syllabi reinforce the larger male-dominant view of knowledge as one that students acquire and use make [sic] the correct decision.
So, in other words, using logic and the scientific method are inherently “male” ways of knowing that women and minorities cannot employ. Rather than rejecting this insulting view of women and minorities’ intellectual and rational capacities, Parson uses it as a pretext to advocate that science classes abandon the scientific method itself (which rests on the assumption that truth is unchanging and knowable) and all other “male” forms of oppression, such as “weed-out courses, courses that grade on a curve, a competitive environment, reliance on lecture as a teaching method, an individualistic culture, and comprehensive exams.”
(...)
Link: http://thefederalist.com/2016/09/29/feminist-phd-candidate-science-sexist-not-subjective/
“Mother Nature needs her daughters,” said Dattner, an Australian entrepreneur and leadership coach.
No, she said it wrong. That is NOT how a proper leftist talks! You have to add “and stuff” at the end of a proper leftist comment.
Incorrect:
“Mother Nature needs her daughters”
Correct:
“Mother Nature needs her daughters and stuff”
WHat? There are (other than a couple researchers) no men there. And there are no fossil fuels being used there.
This is like taking a rocket to Mars to fight against hair loss and constipation.
Random, attention seeking stunt.
Considering how cold this week is going to get they may freeze to death waiting for that global warming.
Climate change affects women more than men? Who knew?
“Largest all-female expedition braves Antarctica to fight inequality, climate change”
...thereby removing themselves from the real world where most of us live, work & play.
Think anyone will miss them? *crickets*
Sure, you run into the occasional neanderthal in a male-dominated field. As a former WM (woman Marine) I can attest to this. I was also treated like a queen by many others & had my choice of handsome, fit males wherever I went. Enjoy the benefits, ladies, & quit whining.
As for the lesbians in the group, eh, sorry!