[WildHighlander57]

OK, is it “will not”, (title) “may not” (detective)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3489095/posts?page=1#1

Or “won’t be” (kabar)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3489095/posts?page=55#55

Or “would not” (Florida native)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3489095/posts?page=72#72

Looks like it’s “would not” (detective)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3489095/posts?page=78#78

IN CONTEXT of “ESTABLISHMENT” opposing him (Trump).

So, burkean, your read of it, “would not” is accurate, given the establishment forces in opposition.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3489095/posts?page=73#73

All y’all, thanks for the posts, I am severely hearing impaired, so I appreciate the info.

M.A.G.A. !!

Vote TRUMP!!

[detective]

Assange says “would not”. I say “may not.”

I agree with Assange’s points about the establishment being totally against Trump but I still feel Trump still has a good chance to win.

I was giving my opinion. I was not simply repeating Assange’s opinion.

[Burkean]

It’s another example of how the press alters reality to suit a selected agenda. Their false version makes it sound like Assange believes Trump will not be elected, whereas his real statement indicates Assange believes Trump would not be elected if the truth was not coming about about Hillary Clinton.