You are correct, but let me add something I have not seen discussed.
Just because you have a secret or top secret clearance does NOT mean you can look at anything at or below your clearance. All programs I know of are on a need to know bases.
For instance if a program is classified at the secret level, just because you have top secret clearance does not mean you have “need to know”. Furthermore to get it you need to not only have need to know but also have to be read into that program.
Add to that the moving of classified information outside the classified area/network is absolutely forbidden. Heck, if you want to listen to the radio inside a secure facility not even the radio cannot ever leave.
All of this Clinton stuff is so illegal, on every account, that I cannot believe they have gotten this far. Almost every level of Clintons excuse violates the rules of secure information handling.
Another thing not being discussed....all talk about Abedin, Weiner, and Hillary is minor, this evidence incriminates the President. He’s involved here, up to his neck, and they are trying to handle it in a proper manner.
At 20,000 feet we are re-living the Magna Charta debate.
For those of you not old enough to remember (:-)) the question was whether the King (in this case the Queen) is subject to the laws that govern everyone else?
Yes or no?
That is what this election is about.
Thanks for the clarification. I hope they nail them for all of it.
Here is a tough question for you. Would the NYPD be allowed by the FED’s to retain copies of this hard drive if they had acquired it during their investigation?