Yep, when you try to “buy” a ruling from the Supreme Court, it means you are putting $$$ in some justices pocket to influence their decision. Last I checked, Supreme Court justices cannot take $$$ “donations” or “campaign contributions” in exchange for ruling in a particular way in a particular case.
"$$$ in some justices pocket"?
"$$$ 'donations' or 'campaign contributions' in exchange for ruling in a particular way"?
I don't think you read the article. This isn't what happened.
>
Yep, when you try to buy a ruling from the Supreme Court, it means you are putting $$$ in some justices pocket to influence their decision. Last I checked, Supreme Court justices cannot take $$$ donations or campaign contributions in exchange for ruling in a particular way in a particular case.
>
Well, they too are to base everything vs. the Constitution for their rulings.
I’d lean more toward your theory (in fact, I suspect it so) than I do to my point.