Posted on 07/15/2016 12:11:22 AM PDT by grundle
A Swedish mother decided it would be a good idea to open up her home to a male refugee from Eritrea, and so she kicked her daughter out of her room to make space. That refugee then decided to sexually assault her 10-year-old daughter.
In the summer of 2015, a mother of three children in Sweden brought two third world asylum seekers into her home. To make space, she decided to move her daughter Emma into her own room.
On the eve of Aug. 18, 2015, Emma awoke to find Isaac squeezing her chest. She suffered breast pain after the incident and didn’t want to tell anyone, as she was afraid her mother would get in trouble. Emma couldn’t even look at Isaac because “he looked scary to her.”
The story came out after Emma finally told a friend of hers, and eventually after several people became aware of the situation, Isaac was confronted.
He protested he would never sexually assault Emma, since he has a girlfriend back in Eritrea. But after further questioning, he finally admitted to groping Emma’s breasts. When the police questioned him, Isaac changed his testimony and denied he had ever touched her.
Isaac meanwhile maintains he’s only 15, since he started school in Eritrea when he was 10 and then went to school for an additional seven years. He finished school two years ago, which according to him, makes him only 15.
The Lund District Court finds this sort of calculation bizarre, but the judge has decided to move forward with the case under the assumption that he is, in fact, just 15. The judge sentenced Isaac on Friday based on the charge of juvenile sexual assault, which means he’ll be sent to counseling.
In the counseling process, he’ll apparently learn to control his impulses and process through past experiences in his life that may have caused him to act out the way he did.
Meanwhile, Emma’s brother says he’s never seen his sister so distraught. She cries often, even though according to her brother, she’s very strong.
Yet, despite what Isaac did, he’ll be able to stay in Sweden.
Cases like these have prompted a fall in support for taking in refugees in Sweden. A November, 2015, poll found 41 percent of respondents said Sweden should take in fewer refugees. A poll earlier in September, 2015, found the answer to the same question was only 29 percent, indicating rapidly growing dissatisfaction with government asylum policies.
Sweden has taken far more refugees per capita than any other country in Europe.
What the xxxx did she expect? You welcome subhuman savages into your country and you expect them to behave like humans?
Women are responsible for most of the ills in the USA and the West, but you don’t hate women?
So it makes sense that women invite conquerors because their acceptance is hard wired .
And the evil muzzies are not stymied by the conscience of their women because they are completely subservient and their political contribution is minimized.
A woman’s blight? Or did you mean a woman’s plight? Freudian slip, maybe?
I don’t hate my mother or my daughter, for helping enable what I need to protect them from. I blame other women for that.
You are assuming I am like many of those people who watch a Youtube video of a lion eating a deer alive and say stuff like “Someone should shoot that lion in the face. It is EVIL!”. My response to them is “It is just doing what lions are programmed to do”.
Women when they engage in hypergamy, monkey-branching and other schemes of resource-gathering are simply fulfilling their biological programming to maximize their genetic potential. I’m not sure that is something to hate, but it is something I need to be aware of to protect myself.
Voting liberal is simply another means of resource gathering, in this case using the government to strong arm resources via taxes from men who work but don’t want to marry and support women like them.
I’m so glad you don’t hate your daughter. I hope both of them don’t lurk on FR and see your asinine remarks.
Yeah. Good find. It is plight.
Not all the ills of the world, just the fall of the Western world.
That’s what some women call projection!!
And I call that emotion.
I notice you can only engage my facts with ad hominem attacks like “asinine” but you don’t actually use science or logic, or refute any actual points.
That is more a liberal tactic, specifically what I refer to as “poop throwing reflex”. (When you have no facts as ammo, fling poop and insults instead)
Most people use their intellect as the means to the end of satisfying biological urges, and their explanations for their own behaviors tend to be post hoc reasoning at best.
And by most people I mean most men and most women. Men have dumb biological urges also, but when confronted by their dumb choices, women tend to have “choices”, while men tend to have “responsibilities”. That is why men need to be pro-active and protect themselves pre-emptively.
Why should I engage you after I’ve said everything I want to say? You have no logic or science behind you. All you have are ‘feelings’ because you’re angry about cultural changes that have impacted on society.
I think the blame can go all around.
Of course, they didn't walk up to a Schwarzenegger and demand he stop with all that testosterone. They started in the school system. And then the home/bedroom. And then the work environment. And then the justice system. And then the political system.
If you missed the last 40 years of rabid feminism that fundamentally transformed the Western world, then you might not be aware they have reached the pinnacle of their objective - the anti-white male movement. Those God fearing, gun loving nuts that O also wants to irradiate.
You are going to need those nuts if you want to fight the muzzies and save the Western world. Are women interested in saving it after obliterating the role men have played for thousands of years? We shall see.
*eradicate. Getting tired of autocorrect
Only insofar as they can push the voting process to the point where they accumulate enough power to undermine voting and replace it with government by fiat. It wasn’t due to women’s efforts that the executive branch got to be what it is now.
That why I said raped. Never thought of using another word.
It was rape.
But can’t have them looking bad in the papers. Next thing they’ll be driving buses into people in France.
animals.
They deserve 100 percent blame for different things.
The mother: negligence.
The animal: rape
So I complete disagree.
Men do vote. For liberals. Not well-brought-up men, but men notwithstanding by way of XY chromosomes. It was men of such caliber that voted for people like Wilson, FDR, Clinton, Obama et al. Seems like the second law of thermodynamics (or perhaps a more spiritual force) has an effect on human morality, even after when God inspires a reversal and establishes/re-establishes moral nations.
They were around even during the Founding Fathers’ era. They somehow convinced Washington to sign the unconstitutional law establishing the Treasury Department, where Congress transferred its enumerated power with respect to “coin(ing) money, regulat(ing) the value thereof, and of foreign coin” (per Article 1 Section 8) to the executive branch, the first in a long series of rubber-stamping the destruction of separation of powers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.