Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sparklite2

I dont see how the stop was unconstitutional if the guy had a warrant out for him. If the cop deliberately stopped him b/c he knew who he was, there’d be no court case. Its like if you are stopped and the cops run your plates and id and they find a warrant on you, they can’t search your car? I’m touching the safety tree, you can’t tag me?

Police are always finding out that people they have detained or stopped have outstanding warrants.


9 posted on 06/20/2016 12:30:17 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Secret Agent Man

Agreed.


13 posted on 06/20/2016 12:31:53 PM PDT by sparklite2 ( "The white man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism." -Jonah Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man

If the cop knew BEFORE the search that there was an arrest warrant on the guy, AND arrested him, that is a search incident to a valid arrest, which has long been allowed.

It sounds like here the cop did a search without probable cause and without knowing that the guy had a warrant on him, then arrested him or cited him because of what the no-probable cause search found, and only THEN found out the guy had an arrest warrant out on him.

This is a close call, IMO.


22 posted on 06/20/2016 12:54:01 PM PDT by Flash Bazbeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson