Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Britain's vast new aircraft carriers will make enemies 'think twice' about starting war
The Telegraph, U.K. ^ | May 20, 2016 | Ben Farmer

Posted on 05/20/2016 10:50:25 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Longer than the Houses of Parliament and able to launch up to 108 air strike sorties per day, Britain’s new aircraft carriers will make potential enemies “think twice” about starting future wars, their senior naval officer has said.

The new Queen Elizabeth Class carriers will be become Britain’s most potent conventional weapon and change the way the Royal Navy does business, Capt Simon Petitt said.

The two vast 67,000 tonne vessels, which have cost £6.2bn for the pair, are the largest warships ever built in Britain.

The first of the ships to be ready, HMS Queen Elizabeth, is due to start sea trials next year and is expected to be ready for its first deployment in 2021. Its sister ship, the Prince of Wales, is being built alongside at Rosyth on the Firth of Forth and is expected to be ready around 18 months later.

The vast ships, which are being built by an army of 10,000 workers, have a four acre flight deck and are taller than the Niagara Falls.

Each vessel will have more than 3,000 compartments and as well as a crew of nearly 700, will also be able to accommodate another 900 air crew and Marines.

Capt Petitt, senior naval officer for the two vessels, said they would become the UK’s “most potent strategic weapon bar the continuous at sea deterrent.”

“It is about stopping wars rather than starting them. If someone does want to start a war I think they might think twice if they see one of these ships coming over the horizon.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: aircraftcarrier; britain; greatbritain; hollow; navy; royalnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

The two vast 67,000 tonne vessels are the largest warships ever built in Britain

1 posted on 05/20/2016 10:50:25 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Interesting. Seems that a few years ago, they were mothballing equipment due to money shortages.


2 posted on 05/20/2016 10:51:53 AM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Yes, I’m sure everyone is scared to death.


3 posted on 05/20/2016 10:52:53 AM PDT by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Great.

Another weapon soon to be in the hands of the future Emir of Britianstan.


4 posted on 05/20/2016 10:53:32 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Perhaps the headline is correct. The PROBLEM will be this: Britain is rapidly surrendering to Islam, which means MULLAHS will be in charge of these warships.


5 posted on 05/20/2016 10:53:57 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper ((Just say no to HRC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Which means Britain’s military is one missile-strike away from being crippled.


6 posted on 05/20/2016 10:56:19 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("During a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act" --George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Save some money; make them half-vast.


7 posted on 05/20/2016 10:56:28 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Chuck Norris finally met his match in Donald Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Should be renamed HMS Jihad!


8 posted on 05/20/2016 10:56:51 AM PDT by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Well, at least they LOOK like a warship. They’re not using that hideous back-sloped bow like some of the new American boats.


9 posted on 05/20/2016 10:57:42 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
What aircraft will they fly from these carriers?

Seems like I heard the F-35 was their choice but wasn't available yet.

10 posted on 05/20/2016 10:59:35 AM PDT by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Excellent Ships.

I hope the Dual Tower Design Works out well.

11 posted on 05/20/2016 11:01:57 AM PDT by KC_Lion (Never Killary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Target practice for something like the Moskva or Пётр Великий... Other than for bullying small/weak nations, carriers were pretty much obsolete in late 45.
12 posted on 05/20/2016 11:02:15 AM PDT by ganeemead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

They won’t stop the muslims from taking over Britain from within.


13 posted on 05/20/2016 11:03:21 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Progressives spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

But isn’t the age of the aircraft carrier coming to an end?


14 posted on 05/20/2016 11:07:42 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

These are about 2/3 size of our Nimitz Class Carriers.


15 posted on 05/20/2016 11:07:52 AM PDT by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER

The article shows F-35s. Looks like they will still have the skateboard ramp at the end of the launch ramp.


16 posted on 05/20/2016 11:08:53 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

How sad this is! This is EXACTLY the attitude the English had about their ships before World War I - and they got their butts kicked not on sea, but on land.

Meanwhile, they are turning their country into Britanistan.


17 posted on 05/20/2016 11:10:21 AM PDT by marychesnutfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I think these things are sitting ducks for the newer (and even the last) generation of anti-ship missiles. You read about some of the ones the Chinese claim to have (Mach 10) and it’s rather sobering. And they are massively expensive to build & operate.

Of course, Britain has no known history of overbelieving in its ships.


18 posted on 05/20/2016 11:10:56 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (I apologize for not apologizing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donglalinger

If Britain does not have the will to fight internal enemies, all the fire power in the world will not help it.


19 posted on 05/20/2016 11:11:40 AM PDT by liberalism is suicide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Too late. The invasion has already taken place.


20 posted on 05/20/2016 11:13:18 AM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. Psalm 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson